窮小子冷眼輯

平心而論,不是有意以文誌頂撞 郝伯伯!實在是目籌真的沒有給喇仔肉糊到?特別是:
一,"multilateralize framework".之於蔡英文主席,平心而論,真的沒有說明錯誤;
二,呂前副總統 秀蓮女士,也無引述有誤;
但依 郝將軍之停火一詞,應該是如:

Under the cease-fire,what is the abandon the hostile pattern between both  sides?In particular,the Strategic Attack Weapon targets each other.

20110904 posted by 台灣窮小子

So-called a word of the abandon the hostile pattern should be international common,in particular,under the confidence,the strategic dialogue,and than,specific groups or people are restricted that cannot provide a nationwide missile system that become the basis for developing one,especially,strategic retaliation capability.Therefore,it must agree between both sides of central government.
The abandon the hostile pattern may protect each sides to have own defense system,and followed the long-term studying that the range must be in 1,300 kilometers apart to build the creation of effective defense zone.
The abandon the hostile pattern can emphasize the accurate quantitative and qualitative,in a while,limits are imposed,including,military deployment.And,followed the long-term studying that it must be in 100 missiles and launchers,so,in the hostile pattern of the agreement and treaty to managing and ordering,including,its spelled out in very specific detail in the statements.in particular,Agreed Statements are signed and issued between the both sides.
Thus,to facing the unsettled of strategic balance and reducing the presure of the technological level that can work together to discuss and dialogue:to prohibit development, testing, or deployment of ballistic missile system.
Obviously speaking,this is the National Security Technology that are not related to history and philosophy,and so on.Unless,the Ex.Secretary of State of U.S.Condoleezza Rice whose eyes drives insane.
Agreed Statements are signed and issued between the both sides
The both sides are sign and issue the Agreeed Statement to abandon the hostile pattern that also establish the Consultative Commission,but,do not forget the DPP, work together to promote its strategic partnership of objections and executions.From now on,no matter what,in which,feels out of sort?And followed the Memorandum has allayed each other.It will emphasize the national security interests,also.So that it does not need to be amended at schedule.
To abandon the hostile pattern is used as multilateralize agreement and treaty to promote the confidence and understanding,including,review.So,Chairwoman 蔡英文 said:" multilateralize framework",which no mistake is?

The eyes drives insane to "multilateralize framework".

停火下,甚麼是放棄敵對狀態?特別是,戰略性攻擊武器相互瞄準?
二零一一年九月四日發表 台灣窮小子

所謂放棄敵對狀態一詞,應該是國際共識;
特別是,互信下的戰略對話,進而限制特定團體或人,不能提供,一個全國性的飛彈系統的發展基礎,格外是,戰略報復能力;
另外是,這必須雙方中央政府同意;
放棄敵對狀態,可能是,保護各自的防衛系統,和依據長期研讀以來,範圍必須在1300公里來有效地建立防衛區域;
放棄敵對狀態,能夠強調精確質量和特性,同時,加以限制,包括,軍事部署;
再根據長期以來研讀,其必須在100枚飛彈和其發射載具;
所以,在此狀態下的協議或條約來管理和規定,包括,說明具體詳細的課文;
特別是,雙方簽署和發布議定聲明;
另外是,面對不穩定的戰略平衡和降低技術層面的壓力,可以共同來討論和對話:禁止發展,實驗和佈署彈道飛彈系統;
評心而論,這是國家安全技術,完全不相關於歷史和哲學等等;
除非,美國前國務卿 萊斯博士是目籌給喇仔肉糊到?
附註:布衣小子信任萊斯博士,同理,相信蔡英文博士;
雙方簽署和發布放棄敵對狀態,也能夠建構協商委員會,但不要忘記民進黨,共同來促進戰略夥伴關係目標和執行;
以後,不論哪一個不爽?依據備忘錄來平息;
這才是強調國家安全利益,所以,也沒有必要來修正時間表;
放棄敵對狀態,也是以多邊化協議和條約來促進互信和了解;
包括,審查,所以蔡英文主席倡:多邊化架構一詞,何錯之有呢?

目酬給喇仔肉糊到?"multilateralize framework".