300   20120407_LDM938  news_1__1903238987 

翻攝來自網絡 如有爭議 煩請告知 謝謝

幾十年老梗,簡單來說,島嶼歷史,狹隘文化餘毒症候群!

有圖有真相,壓制台灣人的思想創新,甚至,中國!

恐怖敵人  威權管理最變態的地方,就是拒絕獨特性,讓人變得沒有靈魂。  

爭議島嶼啟示錄

ROC.jpg  

短文版權歸台灣窮小子所有禁止未授權轉載

序言:
不可否認,長期以來,爭議島嶼嚴重地影響周邊之間的關係;
特別是,歷史缺陷下,各自聲明是一個國家的領土爭議;
即使,數十年以來,也充斥著民族主義者的反對和不爽;
包括,爭議讓步,甚至,導致政府之間,不可能有共同對話來同意;
雖然,中國和台灣有政治和經濟弱點,可能在時間點沒有決定性的力量和作用;
當然耳,應該也不會有滿意的答案;
換句話說:北極熊不以歷史看爭議島嶼,包括,日本;
為什麼還要重複老掉牙的歷史缺陷呢?
歷史缺陷是僵化爭議島嶼的問題,不是國家的政治考量和決定;
特別是,顛覆國內穩定,格外是,不爽的民族主義者強烈反對來製造問題,因為這
僅是惡化,而不是解決爭議;
簡單來說,如果沒有對話和妥協的立場,問題依然存在;
畢竟,爭議可能傷害國家前景和有效改革,特別是,經濟發展;
今天,成功的國家發展和改革是重要的國際問題;
這是具有戰略定義和機會來影響未來的國家活動;

概論感想一:
平心而論,所謂的爭議區域是能夠透過對話,這是不相關於歷史&哲學等老掉牙
論述來解決,即使是,美國也沒有以此來解決爭議問題;
想當然耳,不可否認,這是有一系列前題如:
一,日本不可能讓步,除非,領土爭議取得解決和不相關於經濟援助;
二,必須有美國的外交對話,根據研讀後的感想,其目的可能是追尋,快速和有效
益的模式來影響多邊國家的發展;
特別是,解決中國老掉牙的宮廷歴史問題;
三,領土爭議必須主動地面對障礙,這是不論中國,台灣,日本,包括,蘇聯;
這是解決領土爭議的基本理念;格外是美國作用;
精確地來說:在當時,爭議島嶼是沒有戰略定義;
換句話說,這應該是政治和解下的多邊談判和妥協;
格外是,和平協議;
如果,不爽?美國可能拒絕重返東中國海,甚至,沖繩.
簡單來想像:解決領土爭議如:
一,東北亞地區的戰略平衡和國家因應政策;
二,美國對爭議島嶼的戰略定義;
三,美國對爭議島嶼的外交政策;

概論感想二:
啓示錄背景回顧:
伴隨全球冷戰的結束,特別是,蘇聯消失;
全球之間的國家關係,也自相互敵對狀態轉變成友誼;
格外是,安全夥伴關係的建立,不過,在基本程度上,國土爭議還是處於緊張狀態;
不可否認,這類關係特性:衝突和緊張,大概保持超過一個世紀;
換句話說,沒有安全協議,也等於放棄雙邊的國家關係;
簡單來說,爭議島嶼的戰略象徵定義是有限的軍事和經濟利益和價值;即使,其
戰略定義是強大,畢竟,它代表國家的榮譽和主權;
所以,臭了幾十年,現在還是臭,當然耳,不能忽視各國之間的政治定義重要性,
但不是以此弱點而加以攻擊;
另外是,所謂關係正常化是很困難,也沒有成功範例,但可以努力來對話達成共
識,而且,日本很會羞辱人;
這是共識一詞的定義和不相關於歷史,除非美國人目酬給喇仔肉糊到?
長期以來,日本的政治,軍事,幾乎是跟隨美國,所以,在不爽的口氣下來執行軍
事實力;
因為日本才是美國在東亞的戰略安全夥伴和盟友;
特別是其反共產主義政策,所以,敵人包括蘇聯和中國,還有台灣和韓國,當然耳,
也是日本的積極性作為來強調國土安全;
同理,國土安全不相關中國歷史;
是以,端視六十年以來的爭議島嶼,特別是,八零年代,二十世紀;
它是日本的主要外交政策;
總之,回顧的信號顯示是發現一個合適的模式來巧妙地抓住多國關係架構,特別
是,外交模式.

概論感想三:爭議島嶼對中國的影響?

flag.jpg  
甚麼是傳統的智慧呢?智慧也是以技術來改變歷史和帶來繁榮與和平在國土安
全?
這是國家希望,特別是,面對爭議島嶼或馬克思主義經濟決定論者;
畢竟,歷史證明是不正確的;
端視,硏讀許多學者的報告來說明,有時候,傳統的智慧是一個誤判;
格外是,錯誤政策面對爭議島嶼;
當然耳,不可避免,其在國內的政治要求和影響周邊其他國家的互動關係;
所以,這影響對中國是很明顯;
特別是,六十年以來,日本相當仰賴美國的軍事保護;
然而,這類潛在性依賴,卻否定決策權威,即使是,日本國憲法;
換句話說,日本的國家安全似乎是美國的國家安全,難怪,不爽中國;
可能是一種傘,一個神主牌式的地緣國際政治模式;
姑且不論,國家的目的和能力所謂的爭議島嶼是強調其獨立性;
特別是,有強大的力量;
即使,面對挑戰和威脅的情況下,採取軍事模式來主張對抗傳統和學習美國,雖
然,重組進程需要時間;
簡單來說,最沒有可能是歸還,也許是,應該是重新建立一個新的安全威脅環境
來面對未來的經濟和政治秩序.

概論感想四:美國對爭議島嶼的功用和影響

200711215441395_2.jpg  
依據歷史經驗法則,證明美國的任何主張,可能結束了老掉牙的地位爭議;
格外是,僵局;
以談判和外交努力帶來復甦的機會;
想當然耳,這也能說明,除其他外,美國政策提供具體保證;
特別是,無條件轉移和支持;
另外,在佈署和行動中,不能改變現狀來破壞亞太區域的安全;
格外是,爭議島嶼;
換句話說,一個明顯的行為:妥協和許可,在反對下一類政治要求的保證;
符合美國利益來解決僵局,特別是,美國功用來承擔責任和創造特殊領導關係來
解決僵局;
特別是,維繫中國,日本和蘇聯關係;
沒有任何國家具有相當的權威和影響力來克服和說服僵局;
只有華盛頓當局能夠充當一個中間角色,以承諾來共同面對政治風險;
平心而論,成功的美國努力,將有助於避免極端民族主義的擴散;
同時,也將會說明以具體行動來繼續合作;
總之,美國努力的成功,它可能有助於協助中國拿回來;
當然耳,也將會說明中美關係,已經超越很久的美日同盟;
僅管,中美貿易下的不爽,但是,最高優先還是合作.

概論感想五:爭議島嶼對日本的的影響

日本  
長期以來,依據歷史經驗和傳統智慧來理解東京;
在有些狀況下,是存在誤判,甚至,不了解它國的政策趨勢,面對爭議島嶼;
不可否認,其國內政治的要求相當明顯地影響日本;
畢竟,它國的成功改革,往往地,日本可能會失去機會;
特別是,面對和經營鄰居關係;
或許,認為在歷史上打贏了戰爭;
或許,西邊的國家安全利益大;
格外是,辯論過後,可能將要面對"誰失去了鄰居"?
回顧歷史,日本的國際官方地位的提升是以所謂的階段性推理來強化雙方關係
正常化和以平衡發展原則來促進雙邊關係進程;
所以,端視日本政府希望有努力,將會有回報;
這可以想像它會是日本政府內部的辯論主題;
可能噫測日本政策應該是尋求美國的支援;
換句話說,這可能關係到日本的國家聲譽;
另外是,日本的國家軍事戰略佈署;
不可否認,也不相關歷史;
因為,可能妨礙國家海軍力量投射,特別是,在其安全區域;
現在已經是第二個十年的二十一世紀,但只有日本停留在揮之不去的對抗;
沒有對話和不正常關係來正式結束爭議;
畢竟,現在的問題還是缺少對話和正常化關係共同解決有爭議島嶼;
概論不試圖說明日本關係正常化,僅是可能性評估;
換句話說,長期以來日本有一類現象:譏笑,當然耳,中國也不例外;
格外是,民族主義者認為,爭議下,傳統智慧將會傷害國家利益;
是以可能被看成不受歡迎的企圖;
可能也是日本的政治文化,神聖不可侵犯,是以拒絕改變.

概論感想六:爭議島嶼對蘇聯的的影響

蘇聯  
平心而論,蘇聯看待國家之間的關系特性是經常性衝突和緊張;
簡單來說,只有一個字:不爽;
嘗記得在全球冷戰時期,蘇聯瞄其他國家就是美國的傀儡;
反之,蘇聯就是敵對的黑暗帝國,即使,八零年代二十世紀,蘇聯解體,雙方敵對
狀態轉變成友誼;
但是呢,在國家關係的領土爭議上,仍然有相當程度的緊張;
簡單來說,反共產主義政策還是主要象徵和影響國家之間的關係;
換句話說,幾乎跟隨美國的外交政策來作為國家志氣;
是以採取不友善的口吻,特別是,暗中地強化軍事實力;
同時,爭議島嶼也是影響雙邊關係,包括,經濟援助和外交政策目標;
所謂,現在蘇聯的外交政策應該是和西方國家的合作來實現其政治和經濟制度;
格外是,仿效,同時,也希望取得援助,然而,無可避免地必須,面對強捍的極端民
族主義和保守的共產黨,其信念是必要時使用武力;
可能是豐富的血統來迎戰傲慢,所以,這類攻訐也擴散到任何層面;
特別是,蘇聯軍方,這不僅是相關於國家聲望,也包括,國家軍事戰略佈署;
一個名詞:反對讓步或加強區域自治;
不可否認,還是不相關於歷史等,特別是,國家能在其區域內,利用,自然資源來
取得石油,天然氣等戰略資源來保證和保護自己國家和民眾.
不可否認,這是合理的說法,不是僅強調歷史來說明爭議島嶼;
所以,在任何情況下,爭議島嶼不是問題,然而,問題是國土安全和民眾的幸福生
活;
顯而易見地,美國和蘇聯的論述是正確,包括,德國;
最不好的角度是中國的宮廷歴屎和日本的神聖不可侵犯.
附註:甚麼是蘇聯軍方呢?換句話說中共還算很客氣!

概論結語:
文誌概論,僅是系列研讀後結語,沒有任何顛覆前提;
平心而論,爭議島嶼問題,似乎走向包容,不論是哪個國家;
即使,面對僵硬化態度;
不可否認,所謂爭議島嶼問題,如果採取不妥協模式;
或能想像在未來,可能面對難以退一步的態勢;
端視,長期以來研讀後感想:
其在該國內,往往地,造成特別的政治考量,進一步打擊國家之間的關係,也可能
聯合極端民族主義者,格外是,破壞國家民主前景和改革;
今天所謂的爭議島嶼問題是重要的全球問題;
特別是,對美國的成功的民主化改革和全球戰略挑戰;
可能也是一個轉型來影響有特殊定義的全球行動,提供有效地實行成功的民主
化改革和經濟轉型,包括,外交政策;
所以,不妥協將嚴重地影響國家能力來相互提供和解決;
甚至,破壞直接援助,特別是,美國參與;
不可否認,它是相當重要的具有實際和成本效益來解決爭議問題;
可能是主動幫忙解決來面對爭議問題的未來發展;
想當然耳,長期以來,一直有潛在性的風險和危機成本;
特別是,中國的宮廷歴史和蘇聯的保守態度和日本的神聖不可侵犯;簡單來說,
它才是阻擋和解在東北亞;
文誌僅是理念來看待爭議問題;
因為,爭議問題不相關於老掉牙的歴史問題;
換句話說,端視歷史經驗來說明爭議問題和解決必須有美國來發揮作用,沒有美
國架構的正常化關係,大概也沒有和平協議;
因為它將是一個創建和協調來鼓勵區域內國家政策趨勢;
格外是中國,日本和蘇聯;
畢竟,端視許多不確定性的歷史經驗,往往地,造成專制和極端民族主義論述,甚
至,可能破壞得來不易的和平與民主改革,特別是,經濟活力和社會安全;
如果這是正確?它將應該有高度優先的美國參與來提供合作下的行動和目標;
這是一個跳脫歷史,面對未來,同時,有時間挑戰的全球問題,或想像如:
一,美國的外交主動來解決多邊爭議,因為它可能是還原和符合成本效益的模式
來影響區域內的國家發展;
二,主動的對話應該能挑戰巨大的歷史歧視和障礙;
三,長期以來,日本有神聖不可侵犯的想法,除非,爭議有解決,不然,不很有可能
讓步;
總之,還能夠想像在未來的解決爭議,或如:
一,正式承認領土爭議;
二,對話下,共同簽暑協議;
三,同意下,下個世代最終解決爭議;
解決爭議關係的優先戰略目標是保證區域的穩定和平,特別是,美國參與和伴演
建設性角色,特別是,協調與合作;這是不容許任何利益破壞區域穩定,甚至,引
爆威脅!

 

Didputed islands implications.

Preface:
It cannot denied that,long-term of dispute island is seriously,to effect relations
between around neighbors,in particular,under the Histirical flaws,in which, is a
territorial dispute to claimed by each other.In spite of many decades,also,it floods
opposition and uncomfortableness by nationalists,including,dispute concessions,even
they bring about between the governments which have common dialogues to agree.
Although,China and Taiwan have political and economic weknesses that may not
have decisive power and action in the time spot.In other words,Polar bear have never
used as history to reveiw the distupe island,including,Japan.So,why still repeats out
of date of Histirical flaws?
Histirical flaws is distupe island inflexibility issue,not nation's political
considerations and decisions.In particular,overthrowing domestic
stability.Especially,strong opposition of unconfortable nationalists who make more
issues.Because this will just be spoiled,and not deal with dispute.
Simply speaking,if they are without uncompromising and dialogue positions,and the
issue will still be.
After all.the disputation may hurt national prospect and effective reform,in
particular,economic development.
Today,success of national development and reform are the most important global
issue.They are as strategic significance and opportunities to influence national action
for the future.

Reflective Summary one:

Obviously speaking,so-called the disputation area is able to through dialogue;these
are not related to history&philosophy of obsolete discussion to solve it.In spite of the
United States,which is also use as history&philosophy of obsolete discussion to solve
disputation issue.
Of course,it cannot dennied that those are following of linked premises,as:
1,Japan is unlikely to give way the position unless territorial dispute is resolved,and
not related to economic support.
2,It must have United States diplomatic dialogue,and according with studying of
reflective summary that the goal may seeks quick and effective pattern to influence
the multilateral countries developments.In particular,to resolving the China's imperial
history issue.
3,Territorial dispute must overcome face obstacles,no matter what the
China,Taiwan,Japan,including,USSR.
It will be resolving the territorial dispute of the basic concept. Especially,the United
States action.Precisely speaking,distuped island was not strategic signification at that
time.In other words,under the political reconciliation of multilateral negotiations and
compromise.Especially,peace agreement,if it will feel out of sort,United States may
reject to back east China sea,even,Okinawa.
Simply to imagine that resolving territorial dispute,as:
1.Strategic balance and national responsible policy in northeast asia.
2,Disputed Islands for U.S. strategic significance.
3,Disputed Islands for U.S. foreign policy.

Reflective Summary two:Implications background of reviewing:

Followed the end global cold war,in particular,the USSR was disappear;National
relationship were also transformed from both of opponency to
friendship,especially,establishing security partnership,but,based on the fundanamtal
level,the homeland dispute still remains strained status.
It cannot dennied the this relationship characteristic:conflict and tension that are
approximately to keep more than a century.In other words,there is no security
agreement,is also equality to give up both of national relationship.
Simply speaking,the disputed islands of strategic symbol signification is only limited
military and economic interest and value,despite that its strategic signification is
powerful.After all,it has become national honor and sovereignty.So,it would have
been smelled for more than decades,for now,it will be smelling.Of course,it cannot
ignore the political importance of definitive symbols,but,it is not to take as weakness
to attack.
Moreover,so-called the normalizing relations have been tough,and no successful
examples,but,it can strive to dialogue that come to common consensus.In addition,it
has been mortified by Japanese.
It is definition about a word of common consensus,which is not related to history
unless Americans eyes drives insane.
In long-term of Japan's political and military positios have almost accompanied with
America,so,under the uncomfortable tone that executing military power.
Because Japan is that east-asia of strategic security partner and allies with United
States,in particular,its of anti-communist policies,so,adversaries are including
USSR,China,also,with Taiwan and Korea.Of course,it is Japanese enthusiasm action
to emphasize that,what is the homeland security?
In the same token.homeland security is not related to Chinese history.
As reviewing for nearly 60 years the distuped island,in particular,in the 1980s,20
century,it was major foreign policy of Japan.
To sum up,review of single has shown that seeks as an appropriate model to be neatly
captures the multilateral relationship framework,in particular,diplomatic pattern.

Reflective Summary three:

Distuped island implications for China
What is the conventional insight?Insight is as technology to change histroy,and brings
prosperous and peace in the homeland security.It will be national hope,in particular,to
facing distuped island.or someone who were controlled by Marxist economic
determinism.
After all,in the historical provement is incorrectly.
According with study many experts report to explain,sometimes,conventional insight
is a miscalculation,especially,error policy face distuped island,of course,its driven by
the requirements of domestic politics,and influence around other countries interactive
relations.
So,the implications can be quite significant to China.Since over 60 years,Japan is
more dependent on the U.S.military protection,absolutly.However,these potential
dependence,but,the self-denial of policy making authority.Despite that Japan's
constitution.In other words:"Japan of national security seems that an U.S.security.
No wonder feel out of sort to China.
Perhaps that is a umbrella,an ancestral tablet of the geopolitical pattern.
Going aside for national purposes and capabilities,so-called the distuped island is
absolutely determined to defend its independence.In particular,to having stronger
power.Despite that facing challenges and threats of under the scenario,to adopt a
militarily pattern confrontationist and learn toward form U.S.Although,combinative
process needs more time.
Simply speaking,it will not only be most differently to return,it may be,and should
rebuild a new secure threat envrionment to face economic and political orders for the
future.

Reflective Summary four:Disputed islands of use and influence.

According with historical experience rule to view that U.S. attempt may end the very
old position for disputation,especially,stalemate;that use as talk and diplomatic effort
to bring revival opportunity.
Of course,it also explains,inter alia,U.S.policy provides as position,in
particular,unconditional and support,in addition,on the
deployments and operations,that cannot change the status to destroy security in the
Asia-Pacific area.Especially,disputed island.
In other words,a significant acts:compromises and capitulations;under the opposed.a
promise of political demands.
It is being in the U.S.value to resolve stalemate,in particulr,U.S.role to bear
responsibilty and to the the creation of special leardership to resolve stalemate,in
particular,to holding together with China,Japan and USSR.
No other country has as much authority and influence to overcome and convince
stalemate.It is only together with Washington authorities can act as a broker that use
as promise to work together to face political risks.
Obviously speaking,successful U.S.effort will not support avoid ultranationalist
proliferation,at the same time,it will also explain that use as concrete action of
continued cooperation with each other.
To sum up,the successful U.S.effort,it may in helping China to take it back.Of
course,it will also explain that the Chinamerican relationship has been persisting
value beyond the the U.S.-Japan alliance.Despite that under the China-U.S.trade out
of sort,but,the high priority is still in cooperation.

Reflective Summary five:Disputed islands implications for Japan.

In long term,according to history experience and conventional insight to
understanding Tokyo is that,under the some of conditions,they are being
miscalculation,even,not realize others country policy toward to face disputed island.It
cannot denied that its dependence with political dynamic demands,that can be quite
significant for Japan.
After all,the success of others country reform,more oftenly,Japan can be missing an
opportunity,in particular,face and manage its neighbor relationship.It may have
realized that successful war-fighting in history;it may have realized that westernoriented
of an even stronger national security interest.Expecially,after debating,it will
probably to face "who lost neighbor"?
Look back the history.Japan's international official position of encouragement as
thatmso-called the gradational syllogism to intensify bilateral normalization
relations,and as balanced expansion of principle to advance bilateral relations
process.So,according with Japan's government hope that efforts will have
reciprocation.This will be debate theme within the Japan government.It may think
about the Japan's policy that should seeks U.S.support.
In other words that it may related to Japanese of national
prominence,moreover,Japanese of national military strategic deployment.And it
cannot denied that it is not related to history.Because it may inhibiting national naval
force of projection,particularly,they have been in secure area.
Now that it has been in second decades of 21 century,but,only Japan where stay in a
lingering confrontation; there is no dialogue and normalization relations to formally
end of dispution,after all,is now issue that lack of dialogue and normalization that
work together to resolve disputed islands.
The summary does not attempt to explain Japan's normalization relations,that is only
possibilities assessment.
In other words,in long-term.Japan has a phenomenon:cynicism.Of course,including
China.Especially,among nationalists thinks that under the dispution of conventional
insight ,which will hurt national interests.
And than,it may viewed as an unwelcome of attempt.
It may be a Japan's political culture,which is sacrosanct,and than,to rejecting change.

Reflective Summary six: Distuped island implications for USSR.

Obviously speaking,to viewing the national relations between each other of USSR
have been marked by repeating conflict and tension.
Simplying speaking,just a word:"out of sort".
Reminding and during the cold war ,USSR viewed other countries as a doll of the
U.S.
In the other way round,Soviet Union as a hostile dark empire.
Despite of 1980s,20 century,and dissolution of USSR.,Both of opponency were
transformed to friendship,but,there's still remained strained largely in the national
relation of the territorial dispute.
Simply speaking,anti-communist policies are still mainly attribute,and influence
relations between the countries.
In other words,it has been almost followed the U.S. foreign policy,which become
national ambition,that adopted unfriendly tone,in particular,surreptitiously,its
intensify military power.
In a while,disputed islands also influence in in bilateral relations,including,economic
support and foreign policy goal.
So-called that,now of USSR foreign policy should cooperate with the West countries
to achieve,whose political
and economic systems,especially,copy;at the same time,they wish to get more
assistance.
However,it cannot avoid that must face the ultra-nationalists and conservative
communists,whose belief is that:"by force if necessary. "
Perhaps that rich blood to against arrogant,so,this attack also extends to every aspect.
In particular,military men of USSR.
The issue is just related to national prestige,also,including,national military strategic
deployment.
A word to said:"oppositional concessions". Or,it strengthens:" regional autonomy". It
cannot denied that it is not related to history,and so on.
In particular,nation can exploits their area to take an advantage of natual resource to
get oil,gas,and so on the strategic resource that promise and protect ours nation and
people.
It cannot denied that this may be reasonable issue,not only strengthen history to
explain about disputed islands;so,in any case,disputed island is not issue,however,the
issue is homeland security and well-being people's life.
There is mounting evidence said that the U.S. and USSR of discusion are exactly
right,including,Germany.
The perspective injury is that China's imperial court history and Japan's sacrosanct.
Referrence:What is the military men of USSR?In other words that China's military
men are more friendly

Summary conclusion:

The article summary is only conclusion after studying ,and no any of subversion
premises.
Obviously speaking,disputed islands issue seemed to be moving toward
conforming,no matter which are countries,in spite of meet inflexibility attitudes.
It cannot denied that so-called the disputed islands issue,if they have adopted
uncompromising patterns,as can imagine that that might meet it difficult to reverse
attitude for the future.
After all,according with studying in long-term,that it was frequently brought about
specific political considerations by its domestic.
Further,attacking relationship between countries each other. And it may associating
with violent nationalists.
Especially,destroy national democracy and reform.
Today,so-called the disputed islands issue is probably the most important
global issue,in particular,it will challenge success of democratization reform and
global strategy for the U.S.
It may be a transformation,which influence as specific significance of global action
that provide effectively to achieving success of global democratization and economic
transformation,including,
foreign policy.
So,uncompromise will influence to national capability,that mutual-providence and
resolve,even,destroy direct support,in particular, U.S.participation,and it cannot
denied that it is the more important of practical and cost-effective to resolve disputed
issue;it may be initiative to help resolve that meet future development of disputed
issue.
Of course,in long-term,to continuing have potential risks and costs-crises,in
particular,imperial history and inactivity,conservatism in USSR,and sacrosanct in
Japan.Simply speaking,they are blocks settlement in Northeast Asia.
Article is basic concept to review the disputed issue.Because it is not related to out of
date of historic issue;in other words,reviewing the hostoric experience has explained
that disputed issue and resolution,that must have U.S.played action,if it will no
U.S.framework of normalization of relations,perhaps that it will no peace
agreement.Because it will be a designation and coordination to encouraging national
policy tendency in areas.Especially,China,Japan,and USSR.
After all,to reviewung many of uncertain historic experience,in usually,which has
brought about authoritarian and ultranationalist discussion,even,perhaps that it will
destroy,in which,not easy to come by peace and democratic reform,inparticular,
economic vitality and social safety,If it will be correct?It should have high-priority
U.S. participation to provide both a object and action under the cooperation.
This is a think outside of history,and face the furure,in a while,has time-challenge of
global issue. As imagined:
1,U.S.diplomatic initiative to resolve multilateral disputation.Because it may be
restoration,and tally with cost-effective patterns,that is influencing national
development in areas.
2,An initiative dialogue should be able to challenge the arduous historic prejudices
and blocks.
3,In long term,it has sacrosanct in Japan,unless,dispute is resolved,otherwise,it is
unlikely to give away.
To sum up,it can imagine that dispute is resolved in future,as followed:
1,It will systematically acknowledge the territorial dispute.
2,Under the dialogue,sign agreement.
3,Under the agree,the next generation is finally explanation of the territorial dispute.
Explaining of the dispute relations important priority strategic objective is promising
regional peace stability,peace ;in particular, U.S. participation and play a constructive
role,especially,coordination and cooperation.It will not be allowed any of core
interests to destroy regional stability,even,fire off threat.


文章標籤

台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()