翻攝來自網絡 如有爭議 煩請告知 謝謝
Didputed islands implications.
It cannot denied that,long-term of dispute island is seriously,to effect relations
between around neighbors,in particular,under the Histirical flaws,in which, is a
territorial dispute to claimed by each other.In spite of many decades,also,it floods
opposition and uncomfortableness by nationalists,including,dispute concessions,even
they bring about between the governments which have common dialogues to agree.
Although,China and Taiwan have political and economic weknesses that may not
have decisive power and action in the time spot.In other words,Polar bear have never
used as history to reveiw the distupe island,including,Japan.So,why still repeats out
of date of Histirical flaws?
Histirical flaws is distupe island inflexibility issue,not nation's political
considerations and decisions.In particular,overthrowing domestic
stability.Especially,strong opposition of unconfortable nationalists who make more
issues.Because this will just be spoiled,and not deal with dispute.
Simply speaking,if they are without uncompromising and dialogue positions,and the
issue will still be.
After all.the disputation may hurt national prospect and effective reform,in
Today,success of national development and reform are the most important global
issue.They are as strategic significance and opportunities to influence national action
for the future.
Reflective Summary one:
Obviously speaking,so-called the disputation area is able to through dialogue;these
are not related to history&philosophy of obsolete discussion to solve it.In spite of the
United States,which is also use as history&philosophy of obsolete discussion to solve
Of course,it cannot dennied that those are following of linked premises,as:
1,Japan is unlikely to give way the position unless territorial dispute is resolved,and
not related to economic support.
2,It must have United States diplomatic dialogue,and according with studying of
reflective summary that the goal may seeks quick and effective pattern to influence
the multilateral countries developments.In particular,to resolving the China's imperial
3,Territorial dispute must overcome face obstacles,no matter what the
It will be resolving the territorial dispute of the basic concept. Especially,the United
States action.Precisely speaking,distuped island was not strategic signification at that
time.In other words,under the political reconciliation of multilateral negotiations and
compromise.Especially,peace agreement,if it will feel out of sort,United States may
reject to back east China sea,even,Okinawa.
Simply to imagine that resolving territorial dispute,as:
1.Strategic balance and national responsible policy in northeast asia.
2,Disputed Islands for U.S. strategic significance.
3,Disputed Islands for U.S. foreign policy.
Reflective Summary two:Implications background of reviewing:
Followed the end global cold war,in particular,the USSR was disappear;National
relationship were also transformed from both of opponency to
friendship,especially,establishing security partnership,but,based on the fundanamtal
level,the homeland dispute still remains strained status.
It cannot dennied the this relationship characteristic:conflict and tension that are
approximately to keep more than a century.In other words,there is no security
agreement,is also equality to give up both of national relationship.
Simply speaking,the disputed islands of strategic symbol signification is only limited
military and economic interest and value,despite that its strategic signification is
powerful.After all,it has become national honor and sovereignty.So,it would have
been smelled for more than decades,for now,it will be smelling.Of course,it cannot
ignore the political importance of definitive symbols,but,it is not to take as weakness
Moreover,so-called the normalizing relations have been tough,and no successful
examples,but,it can strive to dialogue that come to common consensus.In addition,it
has been mortified by Japanese.
It is definition about a word of common consensus,which is not related to history
unless Americans eyes drives insane.
In long-term of Japan's political and military positios have almost accompanied with
America,so,under the uncomfortable tone that executing military power.
Because Japan is that east-asia of strategic security partner and allies with United
States,in particular,its of anti-communist policies,so,adversaries are including
USSR,China,also,with Taiwan and Korea.Of course,it is Japanese enthusiasm action
to emphasize that,what is the homeland security?
In the same token.homeland security is not related to Chinese history.
As reviewing for nearly 60 years the distuped island,in particular,in the 1980s,20
century,it was major foreign policy of Japan.
To sum up,review of single has shown that seeks as an appropriate model to be neatly
captures the multilateral relationship framework,in particular,diplomatic pattern.
Reflective Summary three:
Distuped island implications for China
What is the conventional insight?Insight is as technology to change histroy,and brings
prosperous and peace in the homeland security.It will be national hope,in particular,to
facing distuped island.or someone who were controlled by Marxist economic
After all,in the historical provement is incorrectly.
According with study many experts report to explain,sometimes,conventional insight
is a miscalculation,especially,error policy face distuped island,of course,its driven by
the requirements of domestic politics,and influence around other countries interactive
So,the implications can be quite significant to China.Since over 60 years,Japan is
more dependent on the U.S.military protection,absolutly.However,these potential
dependence,but,the self-denial of policy making authority.Despite that Japan's
constitution.In other words:"Japan of national security seems that an U.S.security.
No wonder feel out of sort to China.
Perhaps that is a umbrella,an ancestral tablet of the geopolitical pattern.
Going aside for national purposes and capabilities,so-called the distuped island is
absolutely determined to defend its independence.In particular,to having stronger
power.Despite that facing challenges and threats of under the scenario,to adopt a
militarily pattern confrontationist and learn toward form U.S.Although,combinative
process needs more time.
Simply speaking,it will not only be most differently to return,it may be,and should
rebuild a new secure threat envrionment to face economic and political orders for the
Reflective Summary four:Disputed islands of use and influence.
According with historical experience rule to view that U.S. attempt may end the very
old position for disputation,especially,stalemate;that use as talk and diplomatic effort
to bring revival opportunity.
Of course,it also explains,inter alia,U.S.policy provides as position,in
particular,unconditional and support,in addition,on the
deployments and operations,that cannot change the status to destroy security in the
Asia-Pacific area.Especially,disputed island.
In other words,a significant acts:compromises and capitulations;under the opposed.a
promise of political demands.
It is being in the U.S.value to resolve stalemate,in particulr,U.S.role to bear
responsibilty and to the the creation of special leardership to resolve stalemate,in
particular,to holding together with China,Japan and USSR.
No other country has as much authority and influence to overcome and convince
stalemate.It is only together with Washington authorities can act as a broker that use
as promise to work together to face political risks.
Obviously speaking,successful U.S.effort will not support avoid ultranationalist
proliferation,at the same time,it will also explain that use as concrete action of
continued cooperation with each other.
To sum up,the successful U.S.effort,it may in helping China to take it back.Of
course,it will also explain that the Chinamerican relationship has been persisting
value beyond the the U.S.-Japan alliance.Despite that under the China-U.S.trade out
of sort,but,the high priority is still in cooperation.
Reflective Summary five:Disputed islands implications for Japan.
In long term,according to history experience and conventional insight to
understanding Tokyo is that,under the some of conditions,they are being
miscalculation,even,not realize others country policy toward to face disputed island.It
cannot denied that its dependence with political dynamic demands,that can be quite
significant for Japan.
After all,the success of others country reform,more oftenly,Japan can be missing an
opportunity,in particular,face and manage its neighbor relationship.It may have
realized that successful war-fighting in history;it may have realized that westernoriented
of an even stronger national security interest.Expecially,after debating,it will
probably to face "who lost neighbor"?
Look back the history.Japan's international official position of encouragement as
thatmso-called the gradational syllogism to intensify bilateral normalization
relations,and as balanced expansion of principle to advance bilateral relations
process.So,according with Japan's government hope that efforts will have
reciprocation.This will be debate theme within the Japan government.It may think
about the Japan's policy that should seeks U.S.support.
In other words that it may related to Japanese of national
prominence,moreover,Japanese of national military strategic deployment.And it
cannot denied that it is not related to history.Because it may inhibiting national naval
force of projection,particularly,they have been in secure area.
Now that it has been in second decades of 21 century,but,only Japan where stay in a
lingering confrontation; there is no dialogue and normalization relations to formally
end of dispution,after all,is now issue that lack of dialogue and normalization that
work together to resolve disputed islands.
The summary does not attempt to explain Japan's normalization relations,that is only
In other words,in long-term.Japan has a phenomenon:cynicism.Of course,including
China.Especially,among nationalists thinks that under the dispution of conventional
insight ,which will hurt national interests.
And than,it may viewed as an unwelcome of attempt.
It may be a Japan's political culture,which is sacrosanct,and than,to rejecting change.
Reflective Summary six: Distuped island implications for USSR.
Obviously speaking,to viewing the national relations between each other of USSR
have been marked by repeating conflict and tension.
Simplying speaking,just a word:"out of sort".
Reminding and during the cold war ,USSR viewed other countries as a doll of the
In the other way round,Soviet Union as a hostile dark empire.
Despite of 1980s,20 century,and dissolution of USSR.,Both of opponency were
transformed to friendship,but,there's still remained strained largely in the national
relation of the territorial dispute.
Simply speaking,anti-communist policies are still mainly attribute,and influence
relations between the countries.
In other words,it has been almost followed the U.S. foreign policy,which become
national ambition,that adopted unfriendly tone,in particular,surreptitiously,its
intensify military power.
In a while,disputed islands also influence in in bilateral relations,including,economic
support and foreign policy goal.
So-called that,now of USSR foreign policy should cooperate with the West countries
to achieve,whose political
and economic systems,especially,copy;at the same time,they wish to get more
However,it cannot avoid that must face the ultra-nationalists and conservative
communists,whose belief is that:"by force if necessary. "
Perhaps that rich blood to against arrogant,so,this attack also extends to every aspect.
In particular,military men of USSR.
The issue is just related to national prestige,also,including,national military strategic
A word to said:"oppositional concessions". Or,it strengthens:" regional autonomy". It
cannot denied that it is not related to history,and so on.
In particular,nation can exploits their area to take an advantage of natual resource to
get oil,gas,and so on the strategic resource that promise and protect ours nation and
It cannot denied that this may be reasonable issue,not only strengthen history to
explain about disputed islands;so,in any case,disputed island is not issue,however,the
issue is homeland security and well-being people's life.
There is mounting evidence said that the U.S. and USSR of discusion are exactly
The perspective injury is that China's imperial court history and Japan's sacrosanct.
Referrence:What is the military men of USSR?In other words that China's military
men are more friendly
The article summary is only conclusion after studying ,and no any of subversion
Obviously speaking,disputed islands issue seemed to be moving toward
conforming,no matter which are countries,in spite of meet inflexibility attitudes.
It cannot denied that so-called the disputed islands issue,if they have adopted
uncompromising patterns,as can imagine that that might meet it difficult to reverse
attitude for the future.
After all,according with studying in long-term,that it was frequently brought about
specific political considerations by its domestic.
Further,attacking relationship between countries each other. And it may associating
with violent nationalists.
Especially,destroy national democracy and reform.
Today,so-called the disputed islands issue is probably the most important
global issue,in particular,it will challenge success of democratization reform and
global strategy for the U.S.
It may be a transformation,which influence as specific significance of global action
that provide effectively to achieving success of global democratization and economic
So,uncompromise will influence to national capability,that mutual-providence and
resolve,even,destroy direct support,in particular, U.S.participation,and it cannot
denied that it is the more important of practical and cost-effective to resolve disputed
issue;it may be initiative to help resolve that meet future development of disputed
Of course,in long-term,to continuing have potential risks and costs-crises,in
particular,imperial history and inactivity,conservatism in USSR,and sacrosanct in
Japan.Simply speaking,they are blocks settlement in Northeast Asia.
Article is basic concept to review the disputed issue.Because it is not related to out of
date of historic issue;in other words,reviewing the hostoric experience has explained
that disputed issue and resolution,that must have U.S.played action,if it will no
U.S.framework of normalization of relations,perhaps that it will no peace
agreement.Because it will be a designation and coordination to encouraging national
policy tendency in areas.Especially,China,Japan,and USSR.
After all,to reviewung many of uncertain historic experience,in usually,which has
brought about authoritarian and ultranationalist discussion,even,perhaps that it will
destroy,in which,not easy to come by peace and democratic reform,inparticular,
economic vitality and social safety,If it will be correct?It should have high-priority
U.S. participation to provide both a object and action under the cooperation.
This is a think outside of history,and face the furure,in a while,has time-challenge of
global issue. As imagined:
1,U.S.diplomatic initiative to resolve multilateral disputation.Because it may be
restoration,and tally with cost-effective patterns,that is influencing national
development in areas.
2,An initiative dialogue should be able to challenge the arduous historic prejudices
3,In long term,it has sacrosanct in Japan,unless,dispute is resolved,otherwise,it is
unlikely to give away.
To sum up,it can imagine that dispute is resolved in future,as followed:
1,It will systematically acknowledge the territorial dispute.
2,Under the dialogue,sign agreement.
3,Under the agree,the next generation is finally explanation of the territorial dispute.
Explaining of the dispute relations important priority strategic objective is promising
regional peace stability,peace ;in particular, U.S. participation and play a constructive
role,especially,coordination and cooperation.It will not be allowed any of core
interests to destroy regional stability,even,fire off threat.