POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 DEC 27 2014
THE ISLAMIC STATE'S ATTRACTIVE POWER
POSTED BY 台灣窮小子DEC 27 2014
The question is,how Islam is related to ISIS's rise?
Indeed,it is what ISIS believes that this most basic sense is religion,rather than what one would call ideology.They,ISIS's inherent advantage is that they fight a people who can never be won,or being killed,and is a victory,too.So,ISIS fighters are willing to die in their religious,and they ecstasize it ; believing that they will be entry into heaven. Although,this sounds ridiculous,but this is waht they believe.In other words,the rise of ISIS is just the most extreme of historical concept with intent toward a reasonable future.For instance,it is as a example of the Communist Party of China.In turn,they have failed to explain the realities of the Nation.Of course,absolutely,it is not essentially incorrect,or it can sometimes indistinct shameful history and culture,and that seems to re-turn back the age-old of world.In fact, Muslims do not agree ISIS's idea of religion,or just ISIS has tended to religion into ideology as phenomenal.So, ISIS’s rise,but what the hell is that something of screwed-up?
THE END OF SHAME OF HISTORY AND CULTURE
Indeed,the caliphate is a reminder of human history,or idea of ISIS draws on, and draws power.ISIS’s interpretation will not be similar with the caliphate ; that will be achieved the historical political entity by Islamic law and tradition.And it is similar with fundamental doctrine of Taiwnese independence.Ever since,ISIS has been struggling to define an appropriate post-caliphate political framework,which is as the fundamental doctrine of Taiwnese independence has been curried favour with the Japanese!In contrast, they are lacking of a conception of the Nation,and are willing to coexist with each other.
For this reason, among others,ISIS cannot exist in normal society.That is why intentioned dialogue of ISIS enjoy bleed just like us.As ISIS is still struggling to ensure a caliphate political model.In this sense,ISIS is to the right of the Nation,and also,it will call culture,and not necessarily religion.
Ultimately,the end of shameful history and culture allows for free competition,that is very appropriate.
Islam is not essentially bad or good,and put simply,it is characteristic regional politics.It just is comparing it with other religions help show what makes it so. The ideological distance between them and the West countries isn’t as big as it may seem. In part, this is because traditional history and culture with its unfair vision,and largely incompatible with modern freedom,independence,in particular,political decision-making. Indeed,modern political decision-making not only have a law but one that is taken seriously by large citizens throughout the region and globe.In other words,Islam is just establishing a new model of political community in Medina, include the age-old of Islamic law that will have been appropriate for the age-old of Arabia but are not necessarily applicable environmant that future.Moreover,so-called the Islam,we can find the principles of Islam which are meant to be changed according to the needs of time and environmant.Funnily,while emphasizing the principles of Islam and the basic idea of Muslim,many of whom live in the West countries.In other words,they cannot escape the age-old of history and cuklture.And these ideas lack of traction.And, if they do, it is unlikely to lead an Islamic Change.Instead, they hoped to introduce the West countries mechanisms to balance the burgeoning power of the religion.Put simply,the contribution of Islamic State was to recognize the country,and country power , as a political fact. Especially,the country had more responsibilities which providing education and healthcare,at the same time, planning more discretion in political decision-making.While Islam faith and creed were unchangeable,but which were made an effective distinction in the policy,or not?If something was in the core interest,then it will be reasonable.So,the fundamental goal of Islam State is to establish flexibility,and is was to define between the modern political thought and governance.The age-old of Islam,by definition, was incompatible with the modern democratic country,so there must have a way to the circle.
Finally,particularly in recent decades as their excessive pragmatism,and dishonesty of political pluralism status.Indeed,in this respect,they are only ultraconservatives,or is a heterodox and reformist with political movement.
Indeed,by comparison, and the Muslim world ; new of independent countries have experienced a weakening of disrepute.In other words,a weakening of disrepute has laid the secularization.So,as in the modern Middle East,and such as the Muslim Brotherhood pulled its same leadership and forces from the professional engineering,law,and medicine which coincided with political Islam’s ascendancy.In particular, the Arab world’s preeminent core of Islamic thought - Salafism.Put simply,the assumption of Salafism was that complex and technical Islamic science had been unclear the power and purity of Islam,while as come out by the Prophet Muhammad and his pals.In turn,Salafism is inconceivable the weakening of the Quran’s meaning,and the democratization of religion interpretation.For instance,the matter organizations like al-Qaeda and ISIS.In other words,the age-old of the country's system provided an alternative,one that they think that could put an end to the endless wars.Or said,their order is to absolute in support of the practical and the ecumenical.In theory, the Islamism of the 19th and 20th centuries were different,in particular,the West countries have always insisted on autocratic colonialism.But,independence-concept from the United States has collapsed to nationalistic Islamitic States ; in turn,the Nation of raison d’etat of power is an attempt of Ending of history to rationalize and limit its nationalism operate.Unfortunately,in the Islamism context, the National Independence meant lacking of pluralistic freedom of expression,including freedom and democracy.Put simply,the failing countries.In other words,Islamists have in common is that the National identities are religion and religious identity.So,an open question is,and also is the Islamitic States predicament which lack of Security and stability Nation.
In the end,in accordance with the inferences of the U.S. naval college,the Islamitic States could have understood security and stability,freedom and democracy,especislly,without the ideal of the Caliphate.In other words,leader of the loyal is God endowed with religious legitimacy.
According with Islamists who have tried to violence or terror,and toward their National Revolution.Despite that they stand for solving ill-considered policy of states.
But savage crackdown on its Islamist,many people have been executed ; in turn,in the eyes of angry Islamist activists,can be salvaged.
So,statehood of ISIS will be defeated by more and more people,and more importantly, National tolerationism is vital.
To push Islamist changing,must be in participatory pragmatism,and end a long,destructive cycle of malignant political violence.