ee7a44306  

有吸引力的伊斯蘭國-ISIL(全文)

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 DEC 27 2014

現在的問題是ISIS的興起,與伊斯蘭教怎麼樣?其實,這是他們ISIS所相信的最基本的意義是宗教;而不是什麼人說意識形態!他們,ISIS的與生俱來優勢是打人,誰也不會被打敗,或被殺也是一個勝利!所以,ISIS戰士願意為它們的宗教而死;他們對此表示欣喜,認為他們將上天堂!雖然,這聽起來很荒謬,但這是他們所互信的;換句話說,ISIS的興起僅是最極端的歷史理念,意圖走向一個合理的未來;舉例來說,中國共產黨就是一個範例!另言之,沒有說明國家現實!當然,這不一定是不正確的,或有時候能夠遮掩不要臉的歷史與文化;似乎重返古老的世界!其實,穆斯林不同意ISIS的宗教理念;或僅是ISIS傾向於把宗教放在意識形態的現象!所以,ISIS的興起,但是那到底是什麼死人骨頭?

不要臉的歷史與文化的終結

其實,caliphate僅是人類歷史的一個提醒;或是ISIS借鏡與吸收力量的想法!ISIS的解釋可能不與caliphate相類似;可能是實現歷史政治實體的伊斯蘭法律與傳統觀念;這也類似台灣獨立基本教義?於是,ISIS一直在努力定義一個適當的caliphate政治模式的架構;也如同台灣獨立基本教義捧日本的LP!相比之下,缺乏一個內在的國家理念與願意和平共處;為此,除外,ISIS無法在正常社會存在;這就是為什麼ISIS喜歡流血,就像我們的善意的對話!是以,ISIS仍然很努力確定caliphate的政治模式;從這個定義上來說,ISIS在國家的權利;也可以說是一類文化,而不一定是宗教!最後是,終結不要臉的歷史與文化,允許自由競爭,還是很適當的!

伊斯蘭教不一定是好或是壞;簡單來說,獨特的地緣政治!

它只是為了與其他宗教相比,有助於說明什麼讓它是如此;因為它看起來的意識形態距離與西方國家之間沒有那麼大!在某種程度上,這是因為傳統的歷史與文化不公平的視域;在很大程度上,不兼容現代的自由,獨立與民主,特別是,政治決策!
其實,現代政治決策,不僅有法律,而且,認真對待大多數公民在區域,在全球;換句話說,伊斯蘭教僅是想要建立一個新模式政治共同體在麥地那;包括,古老的法律,這可能已經適用於古老的阿拉伯半島,但不一定適用未來的環境!
另外是,所謂的伊斯蘭教,可以發現伊斯蘭教的原則是意味:能夠依據時間和環境的要求進行改變!有趣的是,強調伊斯蘭教的原則與基本理念的穆斯林,其中,許多人住在西方國家!
換句話說,他們不能擺脫古老的歷史與文化,這類想法缺乏牽引力;而且,如果,他們這樣做,不可能引導伊斯蘭的改變;相反他,們僅希望引入西方國家機制,以平衡宗教的新興力量!
簡單來說,伊斯蘭國的貢獻是理解一個政治事實是,作為國家和國家權力!尤其是,國家有責任,提供教育和醫療,同時,規劃許多自由裁量權在政治決策!
雖然,伊斯蘭教的信念和信仰這是不可改變;但是不是,有效的區分在政策?如果有什麼是核心利益,那麼它將是合理的!所以,伊斯蘭國的基本目的是建立靈活性與區別現代政治思想與現代的治理!古老的伊斯蘭教,顧名思義是,不相容於現代民主國家;所以,必須有一種方法來圓!
最後是,特別是,這幾十年來,過度務實與虛偽的政治多元化立場;事實上,在這方面,他們僅是極端保守主義者,或,非正統的政治思想運動!其實,相比之下,在穆斯林世界,新獨立的國家已經經歷壞名聲的動搖!換句話說,壞名聲的動搖,奠定了世俗化;
是以,在現代中東,舉例來說,穆斯林從工程,法律與醫學等專業,建立同樣的領導地位與力量,正好面對伊斯蘭政治的崛起!特別是,阿拉伯世界最傑出的伊斯蘭思想核心-Salafism!
簡單來說,Salafism的策略,假設是複雜的伊斯蘭學術與技術,遮掩伊斯蘭教的貞潔與力量,同時,展現先知穆罕默德與他的夥伴!另言之,Salafism是不可想像的,弱化可蘭經定義與宗教解釋的民主化;
舉例來說,基地組織和ISIS與此相關的組織!
換句話說,古老的國家系統提供另一種選項;它們認為能夠杜絕,似乎無休止的戰爭;或是說,它們的秩序是普世保留的判斷與絕對贊成的實行!
從理論上說,19世紀與20世紀的伊斯蘭主義是不同的;特別是,西方國家總是堅持專制的殖民主義!但是,來自美國的獨立性思維,瓦解民族主義的伊斯蘭國家;另言之,對國家存在的政變動力是終結歷史合理化,並限制其民族主義的運用!
不幸地是,在伊斯蘭背景下,國家獨立的含義缺乏多元化言論自由的代價,包括,自由與民主;簡單來說,失敗的國家,換句話說,伊斯蘭的共通點是國家認同,是宗教與宗教身分!所以,一個懸而未決的問題是,也是伊斯蘭國家的窘境-缺乏穩定性與安全性的國家!
最後是,依據美國海軍學院的邏輯推論:伊斯蘭國家無法理解穩定與安全,民主與自由,特別是,排除Caliphate的理想模式!
換句話說,忠誠的領袖是在神賦予宗教合法性!

結論:
端視伊斯蘭主義者,嘗試暴力或恐怖來進行它們的國家革命;即使,它們主張要解決,思考不周全的國家政策!但是,在其伊斯蘭主義的殘酷鎮壓,許多人被處決;另言之,在憤怒的伊斯蘭主義者的眼裡,廢物是可以被利用!所以,ISIS的建國將會被越來越多的人否決,更重要的是,國家包容是不可缺少的!為了驅動伊斯蘭改變,必須務實地參與,終結一個長期的,破壞性,惡性政治暴力的循環!
全文終

lead  

THE ISLAMIC STATE'S ATTRACTIVE POWER

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子DEC 27 2014

The question is,how Islam is related to ISIS's rise?

Indeed,it is what ISIS believes that this most basic sense is religion,rather than what one would call ideology.They,ISIS's inherent advantage is that they fight a people who can never be won,or being killed,and is a victory,too.So,ISIS fighters are willing to die in their religious,and they ecstasize it ; believing that they will be entry into heaven. Although,this sounds ridiculous,but this is waht they believe.In other words,the rise of ISIS is just the most extreme of historical concept with intent toward a reasonable future.For instance,it is as a example of the Communist Party of China.In turn,they have failed to explain the realities of the Nation.Of course,absolutely,it is not essentially incorrect,or it can sometimes indistinct shameful history and culture,and that seems to re-turn back the age-old of world.In fact, Muslims do not agree ISIS's idea of religion,or just ISIS has tended to religion into ideology as phenomenal.So, ISIS’s rise,but what the hell is that something of screwed-up?

THE END OF SHAME OF HISTORY AND CULTURE

Indeed,the caliphate is a reminder of human history,or idea of ISIS draws on, and draws power.ISIS’s interpretation will not be similar with the caliphate ; that will be achieved the historical political entity by Islamic law and tradition.And it is similar with fundamental doctrine of Taiwnese independence.Ever since,ISIS has been struggling to define an appropriate post-caliphate political framework,which is as the fundamental doctrine of Taiwnese independence has been curried favour with the Japanese!In contrast, they are lacking of a conception of the Nation,and are willing to coexist with each other.
For this reason, among others,ISIS cannot exist in normal society.That is why intentioned dialogue of ISIS enjoy bleed just like us.As ISIS is still struggling to ensure a caliphate political model.In this sense,ISIS is to the right of the Nation,and also,it will call culture,and not necessarily religion.
Ultimately,the end of shameful history and culture allows for free competition,that is very appropriate.
Islam is not essentially bad or good,and put simply,it is characteristic regional politics.It just is comparing it with other religions help show what makes it so. The ideological distance between them and the West countries isn’t as big as it may seem. In part, this is because traditional history and culture with its unfair vision,and largely incompatible with modern freedom,independence,in particular,political decision-making. Indeed,modern political decision-making not only have a law but one that is taken seriously by large citizens throughout the region and globe.In other words,Islam is just establishing a new model of political community in Medina, include the age-old of Islamic law that will have been appropriate for the age-old of Arabia but are not necessarily applicable environmant that future.Moreover,so-called the Islam,we can find the principles of Islam which are meant to be changed according to the needs of time and environmant.Funnily,while emphasizing the principles of Islam and the basic idea of Muslim,many of whom live in the West countries.In other words,they cannot escape the age-old of history and cuklture.And these ideas lack of traction.And, if they do, it is unlikely to lead an Islamic Change.Instead, they hoped to introduce the West countries mechanisms to balance the burgeoning power of the religion.Put simply,the contribution of Islamic State was to recognize the country,and country power , as a political fact. Especially,the country had more responsibilities which providing education and healthcare,at the same time, planning more discretion in political decision-making.While Islam faith and creed were unchangeable,but which were made an effective distinction in the policy,or not?If something was in the core interest,then it will be reasonable.So,the fundamental goal of Islam State is to establish flexibility,and is was to define between the modern political thought and governance.The age-old of Islam,by definition, was incompatible with the modern democratic country,so there must have a way to the circle.
Finally,particularly in recent decades as their excessive pragmatism,and dishonesty of political pluralism status.Indeed,in this respect,they are only ultraconservatives,or is a heterodox and reformist with political movement.
Indeed,by comparison, and the Muslim world ; new of independent countries have experienced a weakening of disrepute.In other words,a weakening of disrepute has laid the secularization.So,as in the modern Middle East,and such as the Muslim Brotherhood pulled its same leadership and forces from the professional engineering,law,and medicine which coincided with political Islam’s ascendancy.In particular, the Arab world’s preeminent core of Islamic thought - Salafism.Put simply,the assumption of Salafism was that complex and technical Islamic science had been unclear the power and purity of Islam,while as come out by the Prophet Muhammad and his pals.In turn,Salafism is inconceivable the weakening of the Quran’s meaning,and the democratization of religion interpretation.For instance,the matter organizations like al-Qaeda and ISIS.In other words,the age-old of the country's system provided an alternative,one that they think that could put an end to the endless wars.Or said,their order is to absolute in support of the practical and the ecumenical.In theory, the Islamism of the 19th and 20th centuries were different,in particular,the West countries have always insisted on autocratic colonialism.But,independence-concept from the United States has collapsed to nationalistic Islamitic States ; in turn,the Nation of raison d’etat of power is an attempt of Ending of history to rationalize and limit its nationalism operate.Unfortunately,in the Islamism context, the National Independence meant lacking of pluralistic freedom of expression,including freedom and democracy.Put simply,the failing countries.In other words,Islamists have in common is that the National identities are religion and religious identity.So,an open question is,and also is the Islamitic States predicament which lack of Security and stability Nation.
In the end,in accordance with the inferences of the U.S. naval college,the Islamitic States could have understood security and stability,freedom and democracy,especislly,without the ideal of the Caliphate.In other words,leader of the loyal is God endowed with religious legitimacy.

Conclusion:

According with Islamists who have tried to violence or terror,and toward their National Revolution.Despite that they stand for solving ill-considered policy of states.
But savage crackdown on its Islamist,many people have been executed ; in turn,in the eyes of angry Islamist activists,can be salvaged.
So,statehood of ISIS will be defeated by more and more people,and more importantly, National tolerationism is vital.
To push Islamist changing,must be in participatory pragmatism,and end a long,destructive cycle of malignant political violence.

THE END

文章標籤

台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()