10154325_10152387214642062_7301880116263853227_n  

核能-未來能源,而不是歷史與文化的紀念品

I STAND FOR NATIONAL COMMITMENT ; NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 MARCH 11 2015

FRANCE HAS ANNOUNCED THAT REDUCE ITS DEPENDENCY ON NUCLEAR POWER , AND THAN , BELGIUM AND SPAIN.
YET , GERMANY IS PHASING , WASHING OUT ALL REACTORS BY 2022 ; AND THE NEXT IS ITALIAN PEOPLE HAVE FORCED THEIR GOVERNMENT TO SURRENDER RE-STARTING FOR THEIR NUCLEAR INDUSTRY.
FOUR YEARS AFTER THE JAPAN HAS RE-STARTED REACTORS ONLINE ; AND THEY DID NOT FORGET AN ACCIDENT OF THE FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR POWER.
SOME LIVING IN AGE-OLD OF HISTORY AND CULTURE THINK NUCLEAR POWER IS NO LONGER A POWERLESS FORCE FOR GLOBAL ENERGY.
DESPITE THAT GLOBAL ELECTRICITY GENERATION ; RATE OF NUCLEAR POWER HAS FALLEN TO 11 % , AND DO NOT TELL ME THAT THE NUCLEAR POWER REALLY DECLINES?

AS YOU WILL BE STUPID ; QUITE STUPID.

After all,the global governments are still seeking to nuclear power to solve the most urging tough questions they face ; for instance , energy demands and security , and the CO2 emissions.
Many people nuclear power as useless energy deployment ; absolutely , of sourse , it is a good idea , but will be longer to see the dawn of the future.
According with the global facts , many of these countries are weighty dependent on fossil fuel ; at the sane time , need to develop clearer energy and reduce CO2 emissions.
And as IAEA says , nuclear power is still as National pragmatic and real opportunity to provide energy diversity ; in particularlly , given countries dependence on fossil fuel and natural gas.
In turn , the reason is simple - National need for energy , or the country - controlled provides the obligatory supervisal and financial support ; and assisted by the power it can get.
For instance , Ukraine , Poland , and Turkey will also plan to enter the era of National nuclear power.

COST ASSESSMENT

According with a nuclear power station has been built ; and is relatively cheap to operate , in particular , the Pacific Ocean has own uranium of four hundred million tons , in terms of cost unit, it is cheaper than fossil fuels , also , powerful than wind power and solar energy.
Actually , the land wind , natural gas , and coal prices are very expensive ; besides in many countries, solar , and renewable energies are still higher , so just a nuclear power is the cheapest energy.
Now trouble is not equal to question of the future - Nuclear waste
Indeed , approximately 90% of nuclear waste , and contains 1% of its radioactive waste , which this is managed easily.
The station is known as approximately 3% , contains 95% of its radioactive waste.
In fact , there is no lasting facility for stocking high-level waste anywhere in the globe.
But new technology is jointing new nnovations , rather than "BIG WORDS" of history and culture.
So , for now , the gruffest test for nuclear technology is on budget and on time.

INHERENT HISTORY AND CULTURE CRISIS AND THREAT

Of course Nuclear waste is not the only crisis and threat associated with nuclear power.
According with Japan's Fukushima nuclear power disaster is is a timely reminder ; history and culture of crisis and threat involved in harnessing nuclear power.
But technological advances have made nuclear power safer , especially , nuclear power security will not be never discounted completely.
The Japan's Fukushima nuclear power disaster emphasizes that aways from nuclear waste ; to this day , there is no lasting facility for stocking high-level waste anywhere in the globe.
But this program is unlikely any time soon to resolve ; perhaps that technological advances will be in the two decades to resolve it.
The nuclear waste is as a proven , global low-carbon technology ; rather than "BIG WORDS" of history and culture.

NATIONAL COMMITMENT

Perhaps that nuclear power will have political and military will ; and history and culture have already proven a major stumbling block.
Ending of history is to intensify energy efficiencies and reserves , that will also maintain National interests , and play an important role.
In the end , history and culture , even environmentalists just consider costs , which investing in renewables is good idea , but lacking of National energy forward-looking and deployment for the future.

10685611_10152654546816743_4853623422268698602_n

ENERGY FOR THE FUTURE OF NUCLEAR POWER ;

RATHER THAN SOUVENIR OF HISTORY AND CULTURE

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 MARCH 11 2015

法國宣布降低其依賴核能,然後是,比利時與西班牙;

然而,德國是分階段實行終結反應爐在2020年;

下一個是意大利,民眾反對迫使政府放棄重新啟動它們的核能產業;

四年後,日本重新啟動反應爐上線,並沒有忘記福島核能意外;

有些生活在古老的歷史與文化,思考核能不再有是影響力的全球能源!

即使,在全球發電範圍,核能比率已經下降到百分之十,難道核能真的下降?

是以您就牛逼了,非常的牛逼!

畢竟,全球各國政府還是尋求核能來解決所面臨的最迫切的難題;

舉例來說,能源需求與安全,二氧化碳排放量!

許多人認為核能作為無用的能源部署,當然,這是一個很好的想法;

但是,再也看不到未來曙光!

依據全球事實來說,許多國家嚴重依賴化石燃料,同時,需要發展乾淨能源,與降低二氧化碳排放量;

正如IAEA 表示,核能仍然是國家務實與現實的機會,與提供多樣性能源;

特別是考慮到國家對化石燃料與天然氣的依賴!

另言之,原因很簡單,國家對能源的需求,或國家掌控提供必要的監管和財政支持與得到權力來提供便利!

舉例來說,烏克蘭,波蘭與土耳其,也是頭一遭,計畫進入國家核能世代!

成本評估

端視一個核能廠的建構與相對便宜的操作,特別是,太平洋擁有四億噸的鈾,

並且,單位成本裡,它比化石燃料便宜,也比風力與太陽能有力!

實際上,風,天然氣與煤炭價格很貴,

另外是,在許多國家中,太陽能可再生能源的成本還是很高,僅有核能是便宜的能源!

現在的麻煩不等於未來的問題 - 核廢料

其實,大概有百分之九十的核廢料,包含百分之一放射性含量物,這是很容易地進行處理;

廠區大概有3%含有95%的放射性含量物;

實話是,在全球,沒有任何地方擁有永久性設施存儲高放射性廢料!

但是,新的技術聯合了新的創新,而不是歴史與文化的唬爛;

所以,現在最粗魯的核能技術考驗是預算與及時!

天生的歷史與文化危機與威脅

當然,核廢料不是與核能相關唯一的危機與威脅;

端視日本Fukushima 核能災難,這是一個及時的提醒:

歷史與文化涉及利用核能天生的危機與威脅!

但是,技術進步已經讓核能更安全,尤其是,核能安全不會打折扣;

日本Fukushima 核能災難強調是遠離核廢料;

為了這一天,全球仍然沒有永久性設施在任何地方存放放射性廢燃料!

但這樣的方案是不可能在任何時間很快地解決,可能在未來二十年技術進步將會解決;

核能是一個成熟的全球低碳技術,而不是歷史與文化的唬爛!

國家承諾

核能可能有政治與軍事意願,歷史與文化早已經被證明是頑石!

終結歷史-強化能源效率與能源儲備,也將保持國家利益,與發揮重要作用!

最後是,歷史與文化甚至環境保護主義者僅是考慮費用,投資於可再生能源是好選擇;

但是缺,乏國家未來能源前瞻與部署!

 

 

    文章標籤

    核能

    全站熱搜

    台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()