窮小子冷眼輯

【CHINESE ART OF WAR】 

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 13 FEBRUARY , 2017

MR.PRESIDENT OF TAIWAN 蔡英文之首席真命天子

CHINESE PRINCIPLE

Of all the historical developments , none of most impacted China strategy , or was known as the revolution in military affairs.

The age-old of history and culture could not have changed deployments on the strategic level ,

so they would not achieve the military's strategic mission , in turn , lacked of war-fighting art and tactics.

Nonetheless , still Mao Zedong's death , Chinese military could not jump out his ghost - lacked of the National strategic potential.

Although Mao Zedong , he had pushed for the development of China's nuclear weapons ,

but he did not encourage the military to innovate.

Approximately , since 1960's , the concept of history and culture have become strongly entrenched in China military ideology.

Chinese military scholars have never began recognizing the importance of End of history ,

and of using counterattack to determine the direction and consequence of a war.

Chinese military scholars thought that they would achieve a decisive victory by delivering attack-saturated in the adversary ,

and than , by cutting off , encircling , and destroying the adversary's troops with conventional human-wave tactics.

But violent extremism and terrorism brought about fundamental changes - the range and depth of an operational offensive enlarged.

In other words , history and culture would be produced catastrophic consequence that could interfere with the success of war-fighting operations.

Indeed , in every 15 years , Chinese , they they published Military Strategy ,

and helped National leaders develop the conditions of a new strategy -

put simply , as the Chinese military came to view big ship as particularly suitable for Taiwan , than ,

it needed an aircraft carrier for their use.

This strategy's goal was wantonly engage in military aggression rather than attack Taiwan.

This view of strategy was approximately during Mao Zedong's era.

However , China has never been an eye on the future - the military transformation has already entered the development of new era ,

transited into military style and art.

New military philosophy led to changes in tactical concepts.

End of history would be formed the most significant China operational and tactical principles ,

meanwhile , began to recognize Left-wing history and culture as problematic.

Thus , China should began to return away from reliance on history and culture toward reliance on new conventional tactical concepts.

The Chinamilitary leadership should add new new model of strategic options ,

and began to doubt as a response to the concept of history and culture.

Although most military commanders upheld the obligatory belief in communism's victory ,

but overlooked its would perish in the change of the future.

CHINESE DOCTRINE OF WAR

Left-wing history and culture transformation have proven useless and difficult.

Especially , it must acknowledge the regional military power without global hegemonic ambitions.

In accordance with its emphasis on the threat of Left-wing history and culture of violent extremism and terrorism ,

in which , in order to calls for a Chinese military that is with a higher degree of professionalism and with rapid deployment capability.

In other words , the causes of all the threats China is currently faced with lie in the critical conditions of its own history and culture ,

and acknowledging threats , in order to eliminate all sorts of Left-wing history and culture threats and secure National security of China.

It cannot denied that China affixes importance to defending its National core interests ,

and in addition to seek its presence as a global power

But , in accordance with Left-wing history and culture , has led to the development of heightened tension with the other countries ,

in particular , the United States.

Finally , acknowledging the partnership , and decreed that there was no threat of history and culture aggression to China.

The new Military Doctrine did not involvethe issue of Chinese hypothetical adversary's freedom and independence.

The new concept of military is clear about the identity of China's hypothetical history and culture -

the new challenges and threats to the National core interests of China remains showing -

the establishment of a National framework with freedom and independence.

【中國戰爭哲學】

中國原則

在所有的歷史發展中 ，沒有最影響中國的戰略，或被稱為軍事革命

古老的歷史與文化，無法改變戰略層級的部署;

所以，不能完成軍事戰略任務，另言之，缺乏作戰戰術與藝術!

然而，直到毛澤東死亡，中國軍隊還是跳脫不了其鬼魂 ~~~缺乏國家戰略潛力!

雖然，毛澤東驅動中國核武發展，但沒有鼓勵軍隊創新!

大概自六零年代以來，歷史與文化概念已經穩固在中國軍事思維;

中國軍事學人從來沒有理解終結歷史的重要性，以及使用反擊來確定戰爭方向與結果!

中國軍事學人認為，他們能夠透過對敵人實施飽和攻擊，

然後，使用傳統人海戰術，切斷與摧毀敵軍部隊，進而取得決定性勝利!

但是，暴力極端主義與恐怖主義，產生基本性改變，放大行動攻勢範圍與深度;

換句話說，歷史與文化造成災難性後果，將會干擾作戰行動的成功!

其實，每隔十五年，中國發表軍事戰略，以幫助國家領導人發展新戰略因素;

簡單來說，當中國軍隊認為大船，特別適合台灣，它需要使用航空母艦!

這個戰略目標是窮兵黷武，而不是攻擊台灣!

這類戰略理念大概是在毛澤東時代;

不過，中國從來沒有放眼於未來，軍事變革早已經進入新世代發展，轉型為軍事風格與藝術!

新軍事哲學導致戰術理念的改變

終結歷史將形成最重要的中國作戰與戰術原則，同時，認為左翼歷史與文化是有問題的;

因此，中國應該從依靠歷史與文化，轉向依賴新模式傳統戰術理念;

中國軍事領導人應該增加新模式戰略選擇，開始懷疑歷史與文化的反應理念;

雖然，大多數軍事指揮官堅持對共產主義勝利的強制性理念，卻忽略，其在未來改變中滅亡!

中國戰爭哲學

左翼歷史與文化轉變已經證明是無用與困難的!

特別是，必須承認沒有全球霸權野心區域軍事力量!

依據強調左翼暴力歷史與文化極端主義與恐怖主義的威脅，要求中國軍隊具有更高的專業標準與快速部署能力;

換句話說，中國當前面臨所有威脅的原因在於自己的歷史與文化關鍵因素 ~

承認威脅，以消除左翼歷史與文化威脅，與確保中國國家安全;

不可否認，中國非常重視捍衛其國家核心利益，並且，尋求其成為全球大國的存在;

但是，依據左翼歷史與文化，這導致與其他國家緊張關係發展，特別是美國!

最後是，承認夥伴關係，並宣布沒有歷史與文化侵略來自中國威脅!

新的軍事哲學沒有涉及中國，假設自由與獨立敵人的問題!

新的軍事理念對中國假設假設歷史與文化的身份是清晰的 ~~~

新的挑戰和威脅對於中國國家核心利益才會出現 ;

建立一個具有自由與獨立的國家架構!