0FhhhuHgOY  

【Proposal】

【Taiwan's National Defense Strategy 】 

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子

MR.PRESIDENT OF TAIWAN 蔡英文之真命天子

FIRST , JULY , 2017

Taiwan's National Defense Strategy

According with the Taiwan's the Department of Defense (DoD) has not developed its new defense strategy ,

Uh ! should I say , Facebook.

I have empathy for those charged with strategy development in current's chaotic the Taiwan's the Department of Defense (DoD),

that scient-ese have been involved in more security strategy efforts than is stupid for any Taiwanese people.

Indeed , Taiwan's defense strategy has almost never considered successful , in particular ,

it would not be well along with these forecasting.

Put simply , it must focus on the Taiwanese peoples' domestic politics and economic realities ,

in particular , Taiwanese people , and seek to a dynamic war-fighting platform , and as well as developments in course geopolitics.

Taiwan's defense strategy is a strategy that pushes the strategic goal , tactical deployments ,

and Taiwanese people that will best advance priority interests by using conventional opportunities and overcoming Left-wing's history and culture , violent extremism and terrorism challenges.

Then again Left-wing's history and culture , it is difficult to know what right of Left-wing's history and culture would look like.

Currently , President Tsai's some strategies lauded in the near term have demonstrated to be short-lived in perspective ,

such as former president Ma Ying-jeou's Defense Strategic Guidance ,

which was based on Left-wing's history and culture assumptions that poorly

Taiwan's defense strategy is a non-linear process that must constantly be ended and counterattacked , wide-awake is rewarded.

Since in strategy , Left-wing's history and culture rarely earn the thoughtful and well-intentioned strategies.

Moreover , in anticipation of Taiwanese people ,

Tsai's administration should provide options for Taiwan that are helpful to Taiwan's inside the looking to secure framework and focus priorities major choices.

Left-wing's history and culture will not greatly benefit the National strategy debate.

After all , hard more continuity than change in Taiwan's defense strategy over the coming year.

Taiwan's defense strategy lack of three tactical conditions to maintain a balance and reasonableness ,

such as readiness , preparing to be ready tomorrow , and the force of framework.

As long as the Taiwan is operationally engaged today , Left-wing's history and culture are so tightly ,

which is irrational , and for the future will be a attack.

Left-wing's history and culture like an idiot - Taiwan faces the paradox.

This is a worst-choice strategy for long-term Taiwan would not be preeminence ,

in turn , we are better choice or we can better do when threats are judged imminent.

We should ask the National Security Strategy , rather than continue within the parameters of Left-wing's history , culture , and lies of economy.

This is only a low bar for Left-wing's history and culture , but just insult Taiwanese people.

Neither is my intent.

Instead , it is time to end the omniscient , "BIG WORDS" of myth , Left-wing's history , culture , and lies of economy ,

and accept , as End of history , a more realistic view.

In the National political sphere , Taiwan needed an impossible End of history ,

and in controlling dynamic Taiwanese people as well as to establish a confident and sustainable war-fighting capability and superiority.

In the military sphere , operating solely "End of history' concept will be comprehensive.

Taiwan's Defense Strategy did not depend on a foolish adversary of Left-wing's history , culture , and lies of economy.

End of history - Taiwan's Defense Strategy is not lost Taiwan - Taiwan's political leaders could move Taiwanese people closer ,

lowering ambitions for a foolish adversary of Left-wing's history , culture , and lies of economy.

Under three tactical conditions of the Taiwan's defense strategy ,

establishing and maintaining a learning culture bent on innovations at the strategic , operational , and tactical levels ,

meanwhile , using our Taiwan's conventional asymmetries.

It requires a Taiwanese personnel-centric focus on trying out new model of military operations.

Using our Taiwan's conventional asymmetries means thinking competitively about what we do have for comparative war-fightiong superiority , from the geopolitical and policy , such as Taiwan's advantageous geographic position , freedom and independence.

Such as a trained , ready , and adaptive Taiwanese flocks force ,

since Taiwan currently exploitation being particularly dense about Left-wing's history , culture , and lies of economy.

As Taiwanese's DoD should be in strategy formulation process , and attacks the bureaucratic battle for Left-wing's history and culture ,

that make greater headway in innovation , and Taiwan's conventional asymmetries.

The bureaucratic battle for Left-wing's history and culture would lack a clear National economic benefit.

The bureaucratic battle for Left-wing's history and culture would lack a powerful Right-wing's Taiwanese owners.

Right-wing's Taiwanese owners will be ripe for politicization.

Right-wing's Taiwanese owners' innovations , and policy asymmetries remain to become symbols for broader political challenges.

For instance , the conventional Taiwanese independence and freedom are system is one of our greatest political-military asymmetric superioroty , providing for greater flexibility in deployment and employment of our Taiwanese people across the globe.

It provides opportunities for complementary capability development and capacity expansion across a interoperable force.

Denying the myth of Left-wing's history , culture , and lies of economy.

The innovation , and Taiwan's conventional asymmetries will be crucial.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

07012017  

【建議~~~台灣的國家防衛策略】 

建議~~~台灣的國家防衛策略

端視台灣國防部,沒有擬定新的防衛戰略;

恩,應該說是Facebook!

我對當前混亂的台灣國防部表示同情;

參與安全戰略的蛋頭,比任何台灣人糟糕!

其實,台灣的防衛策略部署從來沒有被認為是成功的;

特別是,無法進行最好的預測!

簡單來說,他必須針對台灣的經濟現實與境內政治現實;

尤其是,台灣人,與考量地緣政治發展下,尋求一個有活力的作戰平台!

台灣防衛戰略是透過,利用傳統的機會,與反擊左翼歷史與文化暴力極端主義與恐怖主義的挑戰;

最有效驅動台灣優先利益,策略目標,戰術部署,與台灣人,而聯合的一類戰略!

如果再一次,左翼歷史與文化,那很困難知道,甚麼歷史與文化有甚麼樣子!

當前總統蔡英文的有些戰略部署已經證明僅是短暫的;

或如,前總統 馬英九的國防戰略指導;

它是基於不好的左翼歷史與文化假設!

台灣防衛戰略是一個非常的進程,必須不斷地,終結與反擊,機警才能有回報;

因為在策略上,左翼歷史與文化,很少有考慮周到與善意的策略!

此外,在台灣人的期待下,蔡英文政府應該提供,有力地選擇;

有助於台灣內部尋求安全框架與重點優先的主要選擇!

左翼歷史與文化對國家戰略辯論,並沒有太多的好處!

畢竟在未來幾年間台灣防衛戰略的改變將會越來越困難

台灣防衛戰略,缺乏三個戰術因素,以維持平衡與合理;

或如~~~備戰,儲備,與架構調整力!

過於緊密的左翼歷史與文化,台灣,今天在行動的作為這是不合理的,對未來將是一個打擊;

左翼歷史與文化像一個白癡一樣;

台灣面對著這樣一個悖論!

長期以來,台灣無法擁有軍事優勢最佳選擇戰略;

另言之,我們能夠做所有的選擇,或是我們不能做的更好;

當威脅即將來臨!

我們應該要求國家安全戰略,而不是繼續在左翼歷史,文化,與謊話經濟學的範圍內;

對於左翼歷史與文化來說,它們僅是一個低標準,但侮辱台灣人;

我的意圖,也不是!

反之,現在是終結,無所不知的左翼歷史,文化謊話經濟學的唬爛神話;

接受更現實的終結歷史觀點!

在國家政治領域中,台灣需要一個不可能的終結歷史;

掌握有活力的台灣人,與建立互信與能夠持續發展的作戰能力與優勢;

在國家軍事領域中,只有終結歷史的理念才是全面性;

台灣防衛戰略不需要.笨蛋的左翼歷史.文化與謊話經濟學敵人!

終結歷史,才不會丟掉台灣;

台灣政治領導人能夠更加貼近台灣人;

降低左翼歷史,文化與謊話經濟學敵人的野心!

三個戰術因素下,台灣防衛戰略,建立與維持,在戰略,作戰,戰術層面上,創新的學習文化,

同時,利用我們的不對稱性台灣傳統;

它需要以台灣人為核心重點;

重點是嘗試新模式軍事作戰!

利用我們的不對稱台灣傳統,意味從地緣政治與政策;

舉例來說,有利的台灣地理優勢,自由與獨立,競爭地,思考我們有哪些作戰優勢;

或如,訓練有素的,準備好,與有適應力的台灣羊群;

因為台灣,當前,面對左翼歷史文,化與謊話經濟學的不對稱的剝削!

是以台灣國防部應該在戰略擬定過程,打擊左翼歷史與文化的官僚作戰,以提高創新與不對稱性台灣傳統!

左翼歷史與文化的官僚作戰,缺乏明顯的國家經濟效益;

左翼歷史與文化的官僚作戰,缺乏強大的右邊台灣人支持;

右邊台灣人是準備妥當的政治化;

右邊台灣人的創新與不對稱性政策,才是廣泛的政治挑戰的標誌!

舉例來說,台灣獨立與自由的傳統,是我們最偉大的政治和軍事不對稱優勢之一;

為我們台灣人在全球的部署和就業提供最大的靈活性!

它在相互操作力層面互補與開發能力的擴張提供機會;

是以拒絕左翼歷史,文化與謊話經濟學的神話;

創新與不對稱性台灣傳統將是至關重要的!

 

    台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()