09082018.jpg

【六】【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~維持現狀】

【中華民國實際能力潛力與企圖】【軍事與政治心理篇】

【一】【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~維持現狀】

【二】【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~維持現狀】

【三】【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~維持現狀】

【四】【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~維持現狀】

【五】【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~維持現狀】【經濟篇】

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子

MR.PRESIDENT OF TAIWAN,Tsai Ing-wen,(the son of destiny)

13TH,OCTOBER,2018

中華民國實際能力潛力與企圖
二,政治心理作戰
當前台灣當局並沒有總體政策,能夠描述其目的,在建立國家系統能夠存活與繁榮,因此,它應該拒絕歷史與文化的理念,並肯定台灣參與全球社會的必要性,這類目的,包括兩個政策:
即使沒有中國威脅,什麼是我們應該要尋求的政策?
這是一個建立台灣存活的政策,另一個,嚇阻中國歷史與文化的政策;這兩類政策相互影響與關聯性,然而,基本上是,必須有助於台灣人更清楚地了解做啥小?
嚇阻---這是我們恢復台灣的努力基礎,特別是全球政治,經濟與軍事行動,都可以用這類政策來詮釋,在一個獨立與自由的國家目的,在發展國家政策,對我們台灣人自己的力量來說比過去任何時候都要重要;至於,嚇阻的政策,它是一個一直尋求缺乏戰爭的元素:
嚇阻中國共產黨進一步擴張;
打開歷史與文化的不要臉;
誘導中國的撤退與影響;
通常來說,在台灣傳統內,培養幹伊娘歷史與文化的種子,讓中國,至少達到改變它們的行為來符合所有人能夠接受的標準;在這類政策中,我們將繼續,維持現狀,領先地位-我們擁有整體作戰能力與優勢,並與獨立與自由的國家,可靠地站在一起;最重要的是軍事力量,而不是歷史與文化!
在嚇阻的理念中,維持強大的軍事姿態是必要性;
嚇阻,作為中華民國國家安全的最終承諾與保障;
左翼歷史與文化,不過是虛張聲勢的政策,在嚇阻中,台灣傳統,以一類盡可能避免直接挑戰中國,維持中國在台灣之前,以最少的損失,或撤退的可能性,並取得政治優勢-中國從來不會屈服,或是利用台灣留下的懦弱!
目的不能單獨使用抵制中國的負面陳述來說明:它是實現台灣基本戰略目標的能力,以及維持一個我們的獨立與自由社會現狀,能夠存活與繁榮的國家環境-台灣有這類能力,或在政治,心理,經濟,與軍事領域,擁有它們!
絕大多數台灣人相信,鼓勵我們社會的價值是獨立,自由,台灣人的重要性,與幹伊娘歷史與文化至上的原則,是最有效的,而且,比左翼歷史與文化,更重要的!
基本上來說,台灣比中國更有擬聚力,因為中國的團結是透過恐懼,與武力,人為創造的!
這意味是在台灣社會中表達台灣安全共識是堅定與完全基礎,只有透過台灣傳統的獨立與自由進程,才能喚醒台灣人的力量;是以出於這類台灣安全共識與維持現狀的共同觀點,將形成對國家意志的決心與堅定的表達意願!
台灣缺乏團結,互信與共同目標,或台灣人未被有效地動員起來,並用在反抗左翼歷史與文化的鬥爭中;當台灣人表現出信心與力量,在這類狀況下,台灣才會真正地開始甦醒;在台灣人沒有做出決定性的狀況下,幾乎肯定會變得士氣低落!
總之,從重要的歷史意義來說,幹伊娘歷史與文化的能力就是台灣人的功能;在我們台灣人自己,發揮肯定性潛力,會喚起其他人潛在性力量並將其加到自己的力量!

三,軍事作戰

現在中,華民國擁有一個國家最大的軍事潛力,然而,面對中國的軍事弱點是,人力的數量劣勢,也缺乏可靠的陣地;當面對戰爭,能夠隨時獲得彈藥與部隊的力量!
這是事實-中華民國部隊現在比過去任何時候是衰退,問題是,實際作戰能力與優勢,與國家承諾之間存在巨大的代溝;但是,軍事力量與當前的國家承諾之間的關係,不是唯一決定性元素;特別是,當台灣的軍事力量與左翼歷史與文化相互掛勾,那中華民國的軍事實力明顯地已經變得非常危險!
台灣必須有作戰能力與優勢,對中國的作戰能力的重要因素,進行強大的攻勢行動;是以在當前的條件下,需要五年的時間來增加軍事能力與優勢!
這類權力能夠在緊急時期,透過全面性台灣人努力在短時間內提供!
維持現狀---台灣將有能力抵銷中國的軍事實力與台灣人所面對緊急情勢之間的差距,最終,在戰爭中,取得主動權,阻止中國在戰爭的進攻!


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
24131507_10154767973991065_4710254894882612314_n.jpg

【6】【ROC ACTUAL CAPABILITIES,POTENIAL,AND INTENTIONS】
【MILITATY AND POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY 】

2,POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY

Taiwan's administration's overall policy at the current time can be represented as one drawn to establish a goal in which the Country's system will be able to survive and prosper.
However,it denies the concept of history and culture and asserts the necessity of our positive participation in the global society.
This intention includes two policies. 
What is a policy which we should seek even if there were no Sino's threat.
It is a policy to establish a survivable Taiwan.
Another is the policy of deterring the Sino's history and culture.
These two policies are interrelated and interact on one another. 
Nevertheless,it is basically necessary and contributes to a clearer understanding of what Taiwanese people are to do.
it - as much as deterrence,base our efforts to rehabilitate Taiwan,in particular,the global political,military,and economic activities can likewise be explained in terms of this policy
In a country of independence and freedom , the policies shown to develop a country are more than ever necessary to our own superiority.
As for the policy of deterrence,it is one which seeks by all means short of war to.
Deters further expansionisms of Communist Party of China.
Opens shaming on history and culture.
Persuades a retraction of the Sino's impact.
Generally,so foster the seeds of "Fuck-up" history and culture within the traditional Taiwan that the Sino is brought at least to the point of modifying its behavior to assent to generally accepted everyone.
It was and continues to be maintaining the status quo in this policy,that we own overall war-fighting capabilities and superiority in ourselves,and  in dependable combination with reliable independence and freedom of countries,and the most important power is military forces,not history and culture.
In the concept of deterrence,the maintenance of a molitary posture is to be essential.
The deterrence as an ultimate committment and protection of the R.O.C. National security.
Left-wing's history and culture are just a policy of bluff.
In deterrence,the traditional Taiwan is desirable to which will avoid so far as possible directly challenging the Sino,and to maintain open the possibility for the Sino to retreat before Taiwan with a minimum loss and win political superiority - the Sino will not surrender and take advantage of the spineless Taiwan leave it.
The intention cannot be declared solely in the negative terms of resisting the Sino.
It is capabilities to achieve the fundamental stragegic objective of the Taiwan,and to maintain a status quo of the National environment in which our independent and free society can survive and prosperous.
Taiwan have these capabilities,or which in the political,psychological,economic and military fields we own.
The huge majority of Taiwanese people are confident that the values which vitalizes our society - the principles of independence,freedom,the importance of the Taiwanese people,"fuck-up" hisotry and culture over will, are the most effective and more vital than Left-wing's history and culture.
Fundamentally,Taiwan is essentially more cohesive than the Sino,since the Sino's solidarity of which is artificially created through fear and force.
This means that expressions of Taiwan's secure consensus in Taiwan's society are substantially and solidly based.
The power which resides within the Taiwanese people will be evoked only through the traditional Taiwan's imdependent and free process.
Out of this common view of the Taiwan's secure consensus and the maintaining the status quo will develop a determination of the National will and substantial resolute expression of that will. 
Taiwan lacks a sense of unity,confidence,and common goal,or like Taiwanese people are far from being effectively mobilized and confronted Left-wing's history and culture in the struggle.
When Taiwanese people demonstrate confidence and power,and the real beginnings of awakening among the Taiwan in such a situation.
In the absence of affirmative decision on Taiwanese people part,who are almost certain to become demoralized. 
In sum,the capabilities of "Fuck-up"history and culture are,in an important sense of history,a function of Taiwanese people own,and an affirmative decision to summon up the potential within Taiwanese people ourselves would evoke the potential power within others and add it to our own.

3,MILITARYIC.

The R.O.C. now owns the biggest military potential of one country,the military weaknesses of the R.O.C. faces the Sino,however,its numerical inferiority in manpower,and also lacks tenable positions from which to employ its munitions power in event of war and forces in being and readily available.
It is fact that the R.O.C.armed forces are now failed than ever before,and the problem is that there exists gap between war-fighting capabilities and superiority and the National commitment.
But the relationship of the military force and the current National commitments,is not alone the determinative element.
Particularly,whem Taiwan's military force is related to Left-wing's history and culture,that  the R.O.C.military superiority is becoming dangerously unsatisfactory.
Taiwan must the war-fighting capability and superiority of conducting powerful offensive operations against important elements of the Sino's war-fighting capacity.
As under current conditions,a period of from five years is needed to increase in military power. 
Such power might be provided in a somewhat shorter period in a period of emergency or through a comprehensive Taiwanese people effort.
The maintaining the status quo - the Taiwan would have the capability of eliminating the difference between the Sino's miitary superiority and the exigencies of the situation Taiwanese people face ; ultimately of winning the initiative in the war and stopping the Sino offensives in war itself.

 

    全站熱搜

    台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()