02162020-1.jpg

【四】【為什麼總統 蔡英文之真命天子就是這般聰明】

【什麼是未來台灣的一個國家立場?】

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子
MR.PRESIDENT OF TAIWAN,Tsai Ing-wen,(the son of destiny)
16,FEB,2020

 

什麼是未來台灣的一個國家立場?
武漢市最近患上的肺炎已經嚴重傷害了中國的神話,但總體而言,這一承諾始終如一。這一路走來,中國不會授予自治地位以換取承認“一個中國”的存在。
關於台灣,總統 蔡英文當選連任成功地表明,一國兩制死於台灣,實際上,她是對的,幾十年來,中國北京一直在利用歷史與文化,經濟,在承諾下和平統一。但是,對於台灣人來說,自由和獨立的選擇是朝著正確的方向發展的。
實際上,中國北京認為,“一國兩制”被認為是“ 1992年共識”內所有兩岸談判的基礎。
但是,依循全球歷史進程,台灣總統蔡英文一直拒絕承認它們,並拒絕承認,這是對的。
沒有人可以接受左翼歷史與文化在中國和台灣之間。
儘管國民黨承認了92共識,但實際上,淘汰了國民黨傳統主張的任何迴旋餘地。
換句話說,中國的一國兩制仍處於相當非法的地位,例如,香港
正如習近平主席的講話中的“一國兩制”實驗無法提供歷史上的輝煌篇章。
台灣不會成為中國統一的榜樣,而是將獨立和自由模式作為尊重之道。
實際上,就台灣來說,總統 蔡英文當選連任,證明一國兩制死於台灣。
出於某種原因,左翼歷史和文化基本角色教育將無法給中國對抗極端主義和恐怖主義的負面影響作鬥爭。
僅強調愛國主義意識形態在台灣境內,與左翼極端主義和恐怖主義作戰鬥的傳統作用。
實際上,中國的左翼與台灣的右邊的自由和獨立之間存在著更深層次的偏見,包括香港
在左翼歷史和文化背景下,我們可以對一國兩制,而不是左翼批評,保持嚴肅而合理的懷疑,沒有保留其自治地位的前景。
畢竟,理所當然,左翼獨立運動是孤立的,因此他們極不可能這樣做。
這對中國來說是個好消息,
那就是說沒必要的過度干預對台灣和香港事務
但是,台灣似乎確實準備挑戰一國兩制在未來,包括香港。
因為我們要維持台灣傳統現狀,包括香港
從歷史上看,不論中國是否有可能進行軍事干預,或許部分是北京批准的警告,但台灣嘗試避免被中國大陸完全征服,成為另一個中國共產主義城市,因為台灣了解一國兩制不能成為他們可以合理地希望未來的最佳模式。
儘管,這促使北京至少準備了可能的軍事干預,但正如我早先相信的那樣,裂痕肯定在左翼的經濟,歷史和文化中顯示出來,而不是一國兩制。
因此,很明顯,儘管面臨中國挑戰,台灣也可以擁有亮點。

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

02162020-2.jpg

【4】【Where does Taiwan's one country stand in future?】

Where does Taiwan's one country stand in future?
Recent Wuhan pneumonia has badly wounded China's myth,but overall the commitment remains unbroken. 
All the way,China would not grants autonomous status in exchange for recognition of the existence of only "One China."
Regarding Taiwan,President Tsai Ing-wen's Presidental re-election resoundingly demonstrates that One country,Two systems is dead on arrival there. 
In fact,she was right.
For decades,China Beijing has been trying to persuade Taiwan,leveraging both history and culture,economy,
to peacefully unify under the commitment.
But the option of the freedom and the independence went in the exact right direction for Taiwanese people.
Indeed,"One country,Two systems" considers to be the foundation of all cross-strait negotiations within the "1992 Consensus",the China-Beijing believes.
But according with the Global histroical process,President of Taiwan,Tsai has consistently refused and rejected to recognize them,and she was right.
No one can accept Left-wing's history and culture between China and Taiwan.
In spite of KMT recognition of the 1992 Consensus,but in effect eliminating any wiggle room for the KMT's traditional argument.
In other words,however,China's One country,Two systems,remaining on illegitimately is solid footing elsewhere,for example,in HongKong.
As president Xi,his speech,the One country,Two systems experiment could not provide a splendid chapter in the history.
Taiwan will not be example of China's reunification,and highlighting the independence and the freedom model as the respectful path.
In fact,regarding Taiwan,President Tsai Ing-wen's landslide re-election which demonstrates that One country,Two systems is dead on arrival there.
For some reason,the fundamental role education of Left-wing's history and culture will not fight toward combating the negative influence of extremism and terrorism in China.
Only emphasized the traditional role patriotic ideology plays in fighting the extremism and terrorism of Left-wing in Taiwan's domestic affairs.
In fact,there are deeper biases between China's Left-wing and Taiwan's Right-side's the freedom and the independence,including the HongKong.
We can keep serious and legitimate misgivings about One country,Two systems,not Left-wing's criticism,as under Left-wing's history and culture,there is none of the prospects of preserving its autonomous status.
After all,Left-wing's independence movement is certainly isolated,so that they are very unlikely to do so. 
This is good news for China,
and that was an unnecessary overreach into Taiwan,and Hong Kong's affairs.
But Taiwan does appear poised to challenge One country,Two systems in the future,and including the HongKong.
Because of we want to maintain the status quo of the Traditional Taiwan,with the HongKong.
Historically,given the potential for Chinese military intervention whether or not,perhaps that serve in part as a Beijing-sanctioned warning,but Taiwan seek to avoid total subjugation by mainland China to become just another Chinese communist city,since Taiwan understand that One country,Two systems cannot be he best-model scenario they can reasonably hope for the future.
Although,this prompting Beijing to at least prepare for possible military intervention,as I have blieved early,fissures are certainly showing in Left-wing's economy,history and culture,not One country,Two systems approach. 
So it becomes clear that,in spite of the China challenge,and Taiwan can claim bright spots as well.

 

 

    全站熱搜

    台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(1) 人氣()