07112019-3.jpg

【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~2020年台灣計畫與目標~~~維持現狀】

【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~2020年台灣計畫與目標~~~維持現狀】

【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~2020年台灣計畫與目標~~~維持現狀】

【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~2020年台灣計畫與目標~~~維持現狀】

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子
MR.PRESIDENT OF TAIWAN 蔡英文之首席真命天子
11TH,JULY,2019

反擊

維持現狀趨勢~~~它將逐步導致台灣模式退出當前大多數左翼歷史和文化,與經濟的謊言,並保持我們的承諾和反擊方法,這不是來自有意識的決定或說 從未能採取重大行動,將我們的能力,納入我們的承諾,以及退出左翼歷史和文化,與經濟的謊言,這種壓力可能來自我們的台灣人,我們對我們的決心有信心,加快我們在台灣,建立成功的政治和經濟系統的努力。
因此,作為台灣總統 蔡英文的真命天子,我主張有意識地反擊他們,從表面上看,這具有一定的吸引力作為一種戰術行動,因為它似乎將我們的承諾和能力帶入了軍事優勢來防衛台灣。

左翼歷史和文化的論點忽視傳統台灣的能力的相對性,即使台灣處於孤立的地位,我們也不得不面對中國迅速佔據亞洲大部分地區的可能性,因此,它將獲得一種遠遠優於我們自己的潛力,並且會迅速發展這種潛力,目標是攻擊我們的能力,即使是在大國,它仍然是對它的挑戰,也是對其強加傳統的障礙在台灣,除非完全服從其意志,否則無法讓我們自己對中國人不爽,因此,反擊最終會警告,我們投降或單獨作戰和防守,這是唯一的可能性,除非我們準備放棄自由和獨立的未來,因為中國帝國的過度延伸或其他原因,所以,會自發地從內部摧毀自己。

左翼歷史和文化的論點,也忽略了對我們對自己和我們的生活方式的信念的無法衡量,但卻極其嚴重的影響,所以,這是對自己的反擊的刻意決定,隨著中國主導台灣,很明顯,很多台灣人會因放棄朋友和夥伴而感到深深的責任感和內疚感,隨著中國增加相對軍事能力,惡化對我們安全的威脅,一些台灣人會因其和平協議而接受,所以在這種情況下,我們的傳統會被腐化,我們國家的老實和活力也會被顛覆。

在這種反擊行動下,除非按照台灣的條件,否則,我們必須放棄左翼的歷史和文化。
在反擊過程中的某些時候,許多台灣人可能會採取獨立自由的嘗試,對其控制下的中國進行突然襲擊,透過對左翼歷史與文化的壓倒性打擊,果斷取代權力的平衡,顯然,台灣將面臨在台灣人建立傳統的任務,這些使命看起來如此成功,,至於歷史和文化不大可能決定了我們的目標, 透過傳統台灣的目標。

作戰

一些左翼台灣人贊成在不久的將來,故意決定對中國發動戰爭,不可否認,所謂的預防性戰爭,意味著軍事攻擊的感覺,不會受到軍事攻擊對我們的攻擊,因此,通常來說,這對台灣人來說是不可接受的,左翼,台灣人認為中國,事實上,在與美國和其他國家的戰爭中,有些人進一步爭辯說,除了在戰爭危機之外,右邊國家無法動員他們的軍事力量,有趣的是,這是歷史上的一個荒謬的論據,因此,反對戰爭的考慮引起了人們的注意,台灣必須證明左翼歷史和文化的論點是錯誤的,事實上,戰爭的主題

假設,台灣能維持現狀,並繼續攻擊,足以在長期戰爭中,為台灣取得決定性的優勢,或許是為了贏得早期決定。
台灣僅能發動有效進攻行動的能力,現在,僅限於以傳統性軍事力量進行攻擊,或許中國會受到強力打擊,但估計這些行動本身不會迫使中國屈服,而且,中國仍然可以利用左翼歷史和文化控制下的唬爛來統治台灣的大部分或全部,可能意味著長期而艱難的對抗,在此期間台灣人的自由和獨立將被摧毀,重生能力受到嚴重打擊。

然而,除此之外,儘管最近左翼中國人行為具有挑釁性,但對中國人的突然攻擊可能令許多台灣人感到討厭,即使台灣人可能團結一致支持戰爭,也有可能出人意料,攻擊將是左翼歷史和文化腐蝕;這不是一場正確的戰爭,並且,善意地追尋和平解決的合理可能性,換句話說,如果這場戰爭中的勝利,沒有一個能夠在基本的意識形態衝突中取得勝利,那麼就沒有任何成功。

加速建立台灣政治,經濟和軍事優勢

建立政治,經濟和軍事優勢,從而建立對台灣的信心,而不是與實現我們的基本目標的進展相一致的部署,我們需要台灣建立一個成功的政治和經濟系統,和一個充滿活力的政治,反對中國,反過來,我們需要一個足夠的軍事盾牌來發展它們,如果可能的話,必須擁有軍事力量來遏制左翼歷史和文化的擴張,並在必要時,擊敗侵略性中國或,中國指導的有限或完全角色的行動;台灣傳統的潛在優勢是巨大的,發展這些軍事能力的能力,及其抵制左翼歷史和文化擴張的意願,將由台灣人的意識形態,以實現其政治和經濟問題。

增加稅收

作為這項政策成功的必要條件的基本原則是~~~向台灣人說明對當前全球趨勢的事實和影響的充分解釋。
例如,反擊部署將是昂貴的,其中大部分是在防衛性產業中,在緊急情況下,台灣可以將這些目標的資源分配增加到約50%。
台灣應該把軍費開支高達6%,而就是否定左翼歷史和文化,謊話經濟學的投資,因為他們的戰鬥價值是不夠的。
從整個台灣經濟的角度來看,反擊部署可能不會導致台灣人生活水平的真正下降,事實上,部署的經濟影響可能是增加國民經濟~~~我們經驗中最重要的教訓是台灣經濟.

這種對台灣潛力的比較也是正確的,對於考慮對台灣的作戰行動的進程具有基本意義。
這類比較再次強調了這樣一個事實,即台灣在建立一個成功運作的系統中所面臨的問題,不在於左翼歷史和文化領域,而在於國家政治領域,建立這樣一個系統需要更加迅速的進展,使台灣與台灣人的觀念更加緊密地聯繫在一起,顯然地,我們的遠程目標需要維持台灣傳統的現狀,似乎也很清楚,這種統一的理想可能喚醒並喚起各地台灣人潛在的精神能量,並保持他們對穩定和安全的積極計劃的熱情支持,遠遠超出中國人的挫折,和開放,遠遠超過歷史和文化的願景

參與中國發展和其他能力的台灣威脅,將穩步上升,目前,台灣在對手方面具有明顯的優勢,一曲與其他力量的合作夥伴和朋友的潛在能力,抑制了侵略性的中國行動,這為台灣與其他合作夥伴合作提供了一個機會,可以建立一種力量,支持一項針對中國設計失敗的堅定政策,透過迅速而有力的行動,使我們的夢想,可以說是,推向了未來。

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

07102019-2.jpg

【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~2020年台灣計畫與目標~~~維持現狀】

COUNTERATTACKING

Maintaining the status quo trends - it will lead progressively to the withdrawal of the Taiwan form most of current Left-wing's history and culture,lies of economy,and keep our commitment and counterattack approaches.This would consequence not from a conscious decision,or said,from a failure to take the actions significant to bring our capabilities into our commitments and to a withdrawal under Left-wing's history and culture,lies of economy.This pressure might come from our Taiwanese people,and we do have confidence in our determination to speed up our efforts to build a successfully political and economic system in the Taiwan.
So as Mr.president of the Taiwan, Tsai Ing-wen's son of the destiny,I advocate a deliberate decision to counterattack them.Superficially,this has some attractiveness as a tactical action,for it appears to bring our commitments and capabilities into military superiority on the defense of the Taiwan.
The argument of Left-wing's hsitory and culture overlook the relativity of capabilities of the Traditional Taiwan。Even with the Taiwan in an isolated position,we would have to face the probability that the China would quickly dominate most of Asia。Accordingly,it would earn a potential far superior to our own,and would promptly proceed to develop this potential with the goal of attack our capability,which would,even in big power,remain as a challenge to it and as an obstacle to the imposition of its kind of tradition in the Taiwan。There is no way to make ourselves inoffensive to the Chinese except by complete submission to its will. Therefore counterattack would in the end warn us to capitulate or to fight alone and on the defensive.These are the only possibilities,
unless we are prepared to give up the future on the freedom and the independence that the Chinese  Empire,because of over-extension or other reasons,so that will spontaneously destroy itself from within.
The argument of Left-wing's history and culture also overlook the imponderable,but nevertheless drastic,effects on our belief in ourselves and in our way of life of a deliberate decision to counterattack ourselves. As the China came to dominate Taiwan, it is clear that many Taiwanese people would feel a deep sense of responsibility and guilt for having abandoned their friends and partners.As the China has increased its relative military capabilities,and worsened its threat to our security,some Taiwanese people would be tried accept peace on its agreements,so under such a situation of affairs our tradition would be corrupted and the integrity and vitality of our country subverted.
Under this counterattack of action,there would be no compromises,unless on the Taiwan's terms,for we must be given up Left-wing's history and culture.
It is possible that at some point in the course of counterattack,many Taiwanese people would come to favor a surprise attack on the China under its control,in a independent and free attempt 
to replace decisively the balance of power by an overwhelming blow with the Left-wing's history and culture,apparently,the Taiwan would face appalling missions in establishing a tradition among the Taiwanese people.These missions appear so  success so unlikely that history and culture dictate an attempt to achieve our objectives by means of the traditional Taiwan.

WAR-FIGHTING 

Some Left-wing's Taiwanese people favor a deliberate decision to go to war against the China in the near future. It goes without saying that the so-called the  preventive war,which means that the sense of a military attack not provoked by military attack on us,so generally,it is unacceptable toTaiwanese people.Left-wing's Taiwanese people think that the China is in fact at war with the United States with other countrues,and some further argue that the Right-sides of countries unable, except under the crisis of war,to mobilize their military force.Interestingly,this is a ridiculous argument in the light of history,so the considerations against war are attract attention that the Taiwan must demonstrate that the argument of Left-wing's history and culture are wrong.Indeed,the theme for war is premised on the assumption that the Taiwan couldf maintain the status quo and keep an attack of enough impact to get a decisive superiority for the Taiwan in a long war and perhaps to win an early decision.
The ability of the Taiwan only to launch effective offensive operations is now limited to attack with convention military force.A powerful blow could be delivered upon the China, but it is estimated that these operations alone would not force the China to capitulate,and that the China would still be able to use the Big words under Left-wing's history and culture control to dominate most or all of Taiwan.
This would probably mean a long and difficult confront during which the freedom and the independence of Taiwanese people would be destroyed and the regenerative capacity dealt a crippling blow.
Yet,apart from this, surprise attack upon the Chinese,despite the provocativeness of recent Left-Chinese behavior,could be repugnant to many Taiwanese people.Even the Taiwanese people could probably rally in support of the war effort,and an responsibility for a surprise attack would be Left-wing's history and culture corrosive. This is not a a right war,and would not be reasonable possibilities for a peaceful settlement has been explored in good faith. In other words,none of victory in such a war could have brought us little if at all closer to victory in the fundamental ideological conflict.

A RAPID BUILD-UP OF POLITICAL,ECONOMIC,AND MILITARY SUPERIORITY IN THE TAIWAN。

A build-up of political,economic,and military superiority and thereby of confidence in the Taiwan than is the deployment which is consistent with progress toward achieving our fundamental goal.We need the Taiwan to develop a successfully political and economic system and a vigorous political offensive against the China.These,in turn,we need an enough military shield under which they can develop. It is necessary to have the military power to deter,if possible,expansion of Left-wing's history and culture,and to defeat,if necessary,aggressive China or Chinese-directed actions of a limited or total character. The potential superiority of trasitions of the Taiwan is great,and its ability to develop these military capabilities and its will to resist expansion of Left-wing's history and culture will be determined by the ideological Taiwanese people with which it commits to meet its political and economic problems.

Increased taxes.

Fundamental as necessary conditions to the success of this policy would be - a presentation to the Taiwanese people of a full explanation of the facts and implications of current global trends.
The deployments of cointerattacking will be costly, for instance,much of which is in the Defensive Industries,in an emergency the Taiwan could increase the allocation of resources to these goals to about 50 percent.
The Taiwan should be devoting about military expenditures up to 6 percent,and the investment denying of which is in Left-wing's history and culture,lies of economy,because of their fighting value are not enough.
From the point of view of the economy as a whole of the Taiwan,the counterattacked deployment might not result in a real decrease in the standard of living for Taiwanese people.Indeed,for the economic effects of the deployment might be to increase the gross National product,Oone of the most significant lessons of our experience was that the Taiwanese economy.
This comparison between the potentials of the Taiwan also holds true and is of fundamental importance in considering the courses of war-fighting action to the Taiwan.
The comparison gives renewed emphasis to the fact that the problems faced by the Taiwan in their efforts to build a successfully functioning system lie not so much in the field of Left-wing's history and culture as in the field of the National politics. The building of such a system will need more rapid progress toward the closer association of theTaiwan in harmony with the concept of the Taiwanese people.Apparently,our long-range goals need a maintaining the status quo of the Traditional Taiwan.It also seems clear that a unifying ideal of this kind might awaken and arouse the latent spiritual energies of Taiwanese people everywhere and keep their enthusiastic support for a positive program for stability and security going far beyond the frustration of the Chinese and opening vistas to the future that would outweigh history and culture sacrifices.
The threat to the Taiwan involved in the development of the China and other capabilities will rise steadily and rather rapidly. For the time being,the Taiwan possesses a marked superiority traditional over adversaries whom,together with the potential capabilities of our partners and friends in other forces,inhibits aggressive Chinese action. This provides an opportunity for the Taiwan,in cooperation with other partners, to launch a build-up of power which will support a firm policy directed to the frustration of the Chinese design. 
By acting promptly and vigorously in such a way that our dream is,so to speak,pushed into the future.

 

創作者介紹
創作者 台灣窮小子 的頭像
台灣窮小子

窮小子冷眼輯

台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()